• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Do surgeons recognize the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomies?: a pilot study

Do surgeons recognize the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomies?: a pilot study

Mohammed H Al Mahroos, MD, FRCSC, Mohsen AlHashemi, MD, Amin Madani, MD, PhD, Julio F Fiore Junior, PhD, Melina Vassiliou, MD, MED, FRCSC, FACS, Gerald M Fried, MD, FCRCSC, FACS, Liane S Feldman, MD, FRCSC, FACS. Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC

Introduction: Bile duct injury is a rare but serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SAGES Safety in Cholecystectomy Task Force recommends obtaining “critical view of safety” (CVS) prior to division of ductal structures. CVS includes 3 components: clearing Calot’s triangle from fat and fibrous tissue, separating the lower part of the gallbladder from the liver bed and confirming only 2 structures entering the gallbladder. However, awareness and use of CVS in the community is not known.The purpose of this pilot study was to develop a platform to evaluate knowledge and estimate the degree to which practicing surgeons identify CVS.

Method: We edited 7 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos demonstrating different parts of dissection and a final view showing either a completed (3 cases) or incompleted CVS (4 cases). Videos were embedded in a survey that included items about the definition of CVS, whether CVS was achieved and whether surgeons would clip ductal structures without further dissection. Surgeons were asked to choose components of CVS from a list of 11 options that included the 3 correct and 8 incorrect components. The survey was sent to attending surgeons performing cholecystectomy in a university hospital network. Survey-link: (https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BPFWDY6)

Results: The survey was sent to 34 surgeons and 16 responded; 6 (38%) with >15 years of experience. When asked to select components of CVS, 8 (50%) chose only the correct components, 5 (31%) added extra components, and 3 (19%) missed at least one. In the 3 videos where CVS was demonstrated, 75 to 82% (mean77%) correctly agreed CVS was obtained. The remaining felt more separation from the liver bed was required before clipping. In the 4 videos where CVS was not demonstrated, 50 to 87% (mean72%) agreed CVS was not obtained. In 14% of instances the surgeon felt comfortable dividing ductal structures despite correctly recognizing that CVS was not obtained. In these instances, surgeons felt it was safe to clip prior to full dissection of the lower part of gallbladder from the liver bed.

Conclusion: In this platform, only half of surgeons precisely identified the components of CVS but were still able to correctly identify when CVS was obtained in most cases. There was less agreement in cases where CVS was not obtained, largely due to judgment about the adequacy of dissection of the lower part of the gallbladder from the liver. This suggests areas to target for educational interventions to promote safety if confirmed in a larger study.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 80493

Program Number: P098

Presentation Session: Poster (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

49


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities
  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons