• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Different Therapeutic Modalities for Common Bilier Duct and the Gallbladder Stones (A Prospective Randomised Study)

Different Therapeutic Modalities for Common Bilier Duct and the Gallbladder Stones (A Prospective Randomised Study)

Servet Rüstü Karahan, Gökhan Tolga Adas, Bora Koç, Oguzhan Karatepe, Muharrem Battal, Ayhan Ózsoy. Okmeydani Education and Research Hospital, Department of Surgery

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the laparoscopic approach and endoscopic stone removal in the management of common bile duct and the gallbladder stones.

Methods: In 2008-2010 years,70 patients presented with common bile duct and the gallbladder stones that were diagnosed by clinically and radiologically. Patients were divided into two groups according to the therapeutic procedures: group 1(n=35) included patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy . Group 2(n=35) included patients who underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was efficacy of stone clearance from the common bile duct. Secondary end points were length of the operation period and hospital stay, complications, pertaining to demography, return to work and morbidity.

Results: The baseline characteristics of the 2 randomized groups were similar. Efficacy of stone clearance was likewise equivalent for both groups. Group 1 included 19 men 16 women; mean age 48 (32-76), in group 2; 21 men 14 women mean age 52,2 (36-70). The length of the operation periods in group 1( 82; 64-100min) were shorter than group 2 (98,5; 44-160 min.) The period of hospital stays were approximately same, group 1: 2,9 days(2-8 days), group 2: 2,6 days (1-9 days). Group 1 had 3 complications (8,5 %); 2 pancreatitis and 1 papillar bleeding that responded to conservative treatment, group 2; 2 patients had prolonged bile drainage through cyctic drain needed endoscopic sphincterotomy(6,1%) . Return to work period were 18 days (8-22 days) in group1, 16 days (10-20days) in group2.

Conclusions: common bile duct was cleared completely in both prosedures. Complication rates in group 2 were lower than group1. We concluded that laparoscopic approach will be a choise in common bile duct stones, laparoscopic cholecystectomy could be performed simultaneously.


Session: Poster
Program Number: P383
View Poster

112


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons