• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Different Approaches for Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy Looking for a Tailored Route

Different Approaches for Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy Looking for a Tailored Route

Aim: to report our experience in laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) through anterior, lateral and submesocolic approaches .
Methods: 267 patients (pts) underwent LA in our departments. The choice of the surgical route was based on patient (BMI, previous abdominal surgery) and lesion features (size, side, secreting mass, suspect malignancy). Dissection and coagulating technology did change over the decade, shifting for monopolar cautery to electrothermal bipolar energy device. The submeso way, we first described in 2005, was reserved for left lesions not larger than 6 cm. Finally, the approach for right LA was anterior in 116 cases and flank in 4 pts. Left LA was performed by means of anterior way in 103 pts, submesocolic route in 27 cases and flank in 17 pts.
Results: Mean operative time (OpT) was 80,1 min. for right anterior LA (65-150) and 103 for flank right LA (96-180), 108 min. for left anterior LA (80-305) and 81,5 min for left submesocolic LA (40-345). Moreover the mean OpT for bilateral flank LA was 390 min vs 194 min in the anterior bilateral LA route. One intraoperative death occurred in a left LA for pheochromocytoma flank approached. Intraoperative major complications requiring conversion to open surgery were observed in 7 pts: bleeding (5), splenic colonic flexure tear (1), hypertension and severe arrhythmia in pheo removal (1). There were not significant statistically differences comparing anterior, flank and submesocolic routes in terms of hospital stay and pain medications, while bleeding and OpT were significantly lower in anterior submesocolic series. This positive trend was particularly noteworthy in the last year series.
Conclusion: LA compared with open adrenalectomy allows short hospital stay, rapid return to work and best cosmetic results. Moreover, further benefits seem to be found if we are looking for tailor the best approach to the best patient/lesion we are going to treat, leaving the axiom of the absolute superior route for LA toward the each case related best choice


Session: Poster of Distinction

Program Number: P018

View Poster

213


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons