• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Cystic Artery Electrocauterization As an Efficient, Safe and Cost-Effective Alternative in the Minilaparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Cystic Artery Electrocauterization As an Efficient, Safe and Cost-Effective Alternative in the Minilaparoscopic Cholecystectomy

GUSTAVO L CARVALHO, MD PhD, FLÁVIO A JÚNIOR, MD, JOSÉ S SILVA, STUDENT, CAMILA R CRUZ, STUDENT, DIEGO L LIMA, STUDENT, EDUARDO F CHAVES, STUDENT, REBECA G ROCHA, STUDENT, ADRIANO C SALES, STUDENT. UNIPECLIN, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Pernambuco; Recife; Brazil

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is nowadays one of the most frequent procedures in the world. There are several accepted techniques for sealing and cutting the cystic artery, including the use of surgical knots, endoclips, harmonic scalpel and electrocautery. Although the latter approach is faster and less expensive, many surgeons will not use this method as they consider it unsafe. Our objective is to demonstrate that the cauterization of the cystic artery in minilaparoscopic (needlescopic) cholecystectomy is a fast, safe and cost-effective alternative.

METHOD: from January 2000 to August 2010, 1219 consecutive patients undergoing minilaparoscopic (needlescopic) cholecystectomy were analyzed (76.7% women, mean age 46.4 years). All patients had chronic calculous cholecystitis in various stages of the disease or gallbladder polyps. Basic principles for safe electrocauterization were proposed: 1-Use only electronically controlled cautery with monitored return; 2-Use bipolar or blend monopolar energy (30w cut – 40w coagulation, or lower) 3-Use electrocautery in short pulses of no more than 1 second; 4-Do not use any metal clip prior to the use of cautery to avoid spreading energy near the clips, 5-Cauterize the artery always at a distance of more than 2cm of noble structures of the hepatic pedicle; 6-Use dissective grasping forceps for arteries larger than 2mm in diameters. According to the above principles, the cystic artery was cauterized safely next to the gallbladder neck and cystic duct was legated by surgical knots in all cases.

RESULTS: The mean operative time was 42 min. The mean hospital stay was 15h. There was no conversion to open surgery. In 3.1% of the patients it was necessary to convert to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (5 mm). The infection rate of the umbilical incision was 1.8%, and umbilical hernia was found in 0.8%. There was no mortality, no intestinal damage, no bleeding and no damage to the main bile ducts, there was one laparoscopic reoperation for suturing a Luschka duct.

CONCLUSION: Although the safety of the electrocautery use for cystic artery section is questioned, by fear of being insufficient to seal the artery, take much time or cause tissue lesion to the pedicle structures, it does not correspond to our experience. The use of expensive instruments to section or the necessity of more time is unjustified. This study demonstrates that the use of the electrocautery for the occlusion of the cystic artery is a safe, quick and cost-efficient technique. It has been the first choice to patients who underwent needlescopic cholecystectomy.


Session: Poster
Program Number: P379
View Poster

403


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons