• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Comparison of Symptomatic Outcomes Between Patients Undergoing Primary and Reoperative Fundoplication

Comparison of Symptomatic Outcomes Between Patients Undergoing Primary and Reoperative Fundoplication

Zia Kanani1, Melissa Helm1, Max Schumm2, Jon C Gould, MD1. 1Medical College of Wisconsin, 2UCLA

Introduction: Laparoscopic fundoplication remains the current gold standard surgical intervention for medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Studies suggest that on average 5-10% of patients undergo reoperative surgery due to recurrent, persistent, or new symptoms. The primary objective of this study was to characterize the long-term symptomatic outcomes of primary and reoperative fundoplications in a clinical series of patients who have undergone one or more fundoplications.

Methods: Patients who underwent laparoscopic primary or reoperative fundoplication between 2011 and 2017 by a single surgeon were retrospectively identified using a prospectively maintained database. Patients undergoing takedown of a failed fundoplication and conversion to Roux-en Y gastric bypass (for morbid obesity, severe gastroparesis, or 3 or more prior failed attempts) were excluded from the current analysis. All procedures were performed laparoscopically. Patients were asked to complete the validated GERD-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) survey prior to surgery and postoperatively at standard intervals to assess long-term symptomatic outcomes and quality of life. GERD-HRQL composite scores range from 0 (highest disease-related quality of life) to 50 (lowest disease-related quality of life, most severe symptoms).

Results: In total, there were 136 (62.4%) primary and 82 (37.6%) reoperative fundoplications that met inclusion criteria. Of the reoperative patients in this series, 67 (81.7%) were undergoing their first reoperative fundoplication and 15 (18.3%) their second reoperative fundoplication. Most primary patients underwent a Nissen (61.0%) while most reoperative patients underwent a Toupet fundoplication (59.8%). Primary fundoplication patients were significantly more likely to be on GERD medications prior to surgery than reoperative patients (92.6% vs. 75.6%; p<0.01). There were no conversions to laparotomy and no mortalities. Prior to surgery, GERD-HRQL scores were similar for primary and reoperative patients (primary 27.2 ± 11.4 vs. reoperative 23.5 ± 12.9; p=0.10). At two years follow-up, primary fundoplication patients had a significantly better GERD-related quality of life compared to reoperative patients (primary 8.70 ± 7.77 vs. reoperative 14.33 ± 13.54; p=0.02). Prior to surgery, 83.1% of primary patients reported dissatisfaction with their present condition and 87.0% of reoperative patients were dissatisfied. At two years, 12/42 (28.6%) reoperative patients and 7/46 (15.2%) primary patients reported dissatisfaction with their condition (p=0.13).

Conclusions: Patients who need to undergo reoperative fundoplication have more severe GERD-related symptoms at 2 years post-op compared to patients undergoing primary fundoplication. However, good outcomes and morbidity rates of laparoscopic reoperation that approximate that of a primary fundoplication are possible in the hands of an experienced surgeon. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 85037

Program Number: P435

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

50


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons