• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC VS OPEN LIVER RESECTION FOR INTERMEDIATE STAGE (BCLC B) HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA

COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC VS OPEN LIVER RESECTION FOR INTERMEDIATE STAGE (BCLC B) HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA

Avril P. David, MD1, YoungRok Choi, MD2, Ho-Seong Han, MD2, Yoo-Seok Yoon2, Jai Young Cho2. 1Rizal Medical Center, Pasig City, Philippines, 2Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, South Korea

Introduction: The Barcelona Clinic Liver Score (BCLC) currently limits hepatic resection only for small, solitary tumors measuring 2-3cm with no signs of portal hypertension (PHT) or macrovascular invasion. The aim of this study is to show the benefit of surgical resection, and to compare the peri-operative and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) classified as intermediate stage (B) under BCLC.

Methods and Procedures: From 2004 to 2013, 49 patients staged as intermediate (BCLC B) and who underwent hepatic resection was included. These patients were divided into LLR or OLR. Demographics, tumor characteristics, recurrence rates and over-all survival were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: 49 patients were included and grouped into LLR (n=28) and OLR (n=21). The average tumor number was 2±1 for both groups, while the mean tumor size was 4.1cm and 4.9cm for the LLR and OLR group, respectively. When compared with OLR, LLR had lower post-operative complication rates (14.3% vs 33.3%, p=0.118) and shorter hospital stay (9 vs 21 days, p=0.103), although the difference was not statistically significant. Overall, recurrence-free and disease-free survival was comparable between LLR and OLR.

Conclusion: LLR showed comparable outcomes compared to OLR in the treatment of HCC staged BCLC B. Thus, LLR as well as OLR can be considered in selective patients in the BCLC B group.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 88230

Program Number: P531

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

44


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons