• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Comparison of Clavien Class IV and V Complications for Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy Using NSQIP Data and Risk Adjustment

Comparison of Clavien Class IV and V Complications for Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy Using NSQIP Data and Risk Adjustment

Shawn Webb, MD, Ilan Rubinfeld, MD, Velanovich Vic, MD, M H, MD, Reickert Craig, MD. Henry Ford Health Systems

Introduction: Is laparoscopic colectomy independently protective from ICU level complications when compared to open colectomy? Laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with fewer postoperative complications compared to open colectomy. However, it is unclear whether this is true for the most severe complications typically requiring treatment in an intensive care unit. We performed a risk adjusted comparison of laparoscopic vs open colectomy.
Methods: Using the NSQIP Public Use files (2005-2008), we identified all laparoscopic and open colectomies by CPT code. Using the Clavien classification for postoperative complications, we identified NSQIP data points most consistent with Clavien Class IV requiring ICU care (postoperative septic shock, postoperative dialysis, pulmonary embolism, MI, cardiac arrest, prolonged ventilatory requirements, need for reintubation) or class V (mortality). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Odds ratios were calculated to determine probability of having any Clavien class IV or V complication comparing laparoscopic versus open colectomy. Logistic regression was performed to account for preoperative conditions effect on complications (ASA class, wound class, gender, preoperative functional status, preoperative albumin level, azotemia, thrombocytopenia, emergency case, and age > 70).
Results:

Colectomy Laparoscopic Open Univariate X2 Odds Ratio
(p<.001 for all variables)
Multivariate Logistic regression OR
(p<0.001 for all)
Total patients (N) 12,455 33,190
Septic shock 1.5% 5.6% 3.88 1.64
Q-wave infarct 0.2% 0.5% 2.99 1.63
Cardiac arrest 0.3% 1.2% 4.27 2.21
Pulmonary embolism 0.4% 1.0% 2.27 1.87
Dialysis 0.3% 1.6% 4.67 1.94
Reintubation 1.4% 4.5% 3.22 1.57
Prolonged ventilation 1.6% 8.9% 5.95 1.77
Mortality 1.1% 5.8% 5.52 1.54
Any Clavien class IV or V complication 3.6% 15.4% 4.87 1.74

The univariate odds ratio of having any complication requiring ICU admission ranged from 2.27 to 5.52 times more likely if surgery was performed open than with a laparoscopic approach. Multivariate logistic regression accounting for preoperative comorbidities that might affect outcome showed a persistence of an increase in complications with an odds ratio range of 1.63 to 2.21.
Conclusion: Evaluation of NSQIP database demonstrates laparoscopic colectomy confers an independent protective effect on the frequency of ICU level (Clavien class IV) complicationsand mortality (Clavien class V). The protective effect remained evident after correcting for preoperative conditions that might have affected outcome.


Session: SS14
Program Number: S086

97


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons