• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / COMPARATIVE OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN RADICAL ANTEGRADE MODULAR PANCREATOSPLENECTOMY FOR LEFT-SIDED PANCREATIC CANCER

COMPARATIVE OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN RADICAL ANTEGRADE MODULAR PANCREATOSPLENECTOMY FOR LEFT-SIDED PANCREATIC CANCER

Sungho Kim, MD, Kil Hwan Kim, MD, In Gun Hyun, MD, YoungRok Choi, MD, Jai Young Cho, MD, PhD, Ho-Seong Han, MD, PhD. Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Background: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) was introduced to improve the tumor-free retroperitoneal margin and achieve adequate lymph node dissection in patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer. Despite recently increasing reports on laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer, there have been few reports with a focus on laparoscopic RAMPS. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic RAMPS for left-sided pancreatic cancer by comparing the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery.

Methods: Between March 2003 and December 2016, 48 patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer underwent open and laparoscopic RAMPS. To overcome selection bias, 38 patients were selected after excluding the patients who required combined resection of other organs. Clinicopathologic and oncologic variables were compared between laparoscopic group (n=19) and open group (n=19).

Results: There were no statistical difference in demographic and pathologic data between two groups. Compared with open group, laparoscopic group had a short hospital stay (10.1 ± 4.1 vs. 13.4 ± 6.3 days, p=0.053) and was more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (89.5% vs. 63.3%, p=0.056). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, resection margin status, and postoperative complications. The recurrence rate and overall survival rates were similar between two groups.

Conclusion: This study showed that laparoscopic RAMPS for left-sided pancreatic cancer was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stay and increased use of adjuvant chemotherapy compared to open surgery without compromising the perioperative and oncologic outcomes. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87300

Program Number: P534

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

52


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons