• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Central Pancreatectomy : Case -Control Study

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Central Pancreatectomy : Case -Control Study

songcheol Kim, kibyung Song, Haeran Ha, Haeryun Seo, Jaebum Park, Yunghun Kim, duckjong Han, Yunbaik Choi. Depetment of surgery, Ulsan University College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center

Aim : Despite recent advances in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery, few studies have compared laparoscopic central pancreatectomy (LCP) with open central pancreatectomy (OCP). This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between for LCP and OCP as a case-control study as a single, high-volume institutional study.

Material &Methods : In the study period (From year of 2006 to Aug. 2010), we performed 400 cases of laparoscopic pancreatic resection. Among them 24 cases of LCP and 49 cases of OCP were matched by age, body mass index(BMI), past medical history, previous abdominal operation, major length of resected pancreas, tumor size, and pathologic diagnosis.

Results : Main indications were benign or low grade malignant disease in both groups. There were no significant difference in mean operative time (293min vs 274.6min, p=0.373), mean blood loss (2.55mg/dl vs 2.39dg/dl, p=0.822), the patient’s number of red blood cell transfusion (7cases vs 19cases, p=0.428) between the LCP and OCP groups. Bowel movement return to normal and resumption of normal diet were achieved 4.46 ± 2.08 days after the operation in the LCP group and 5.43 ± 1.27 days after the operation in the OCP group (p=0.044). The mean duration of hospital stay was 15.9 days for the LCP group, which was significantly shorter than the 21.6 days for the OCP group (p=0.029). There were no new onset postoperative diabetes mellitus in LCP group. The overall complication rate was 33.3%(8cases) in the LCP group and and 38.8%(19case) in the OCP group, which is not significantly different (p=0.656).

Conclusion : The use of LCP for the benign or low grade malignant lesions of the pancreatic body and neck portion is feasible and safe. The laparoscopic approach to central pancreatectomy appears to provide advantages of early resumption of normal diet, reduction of postoperative hospital stay, and prevention of new onset postoperative diabetes mellitus without any further complications compared to open method.


Session: Poster
Program Number: P370
View Poster

102


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons