• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS CHOLECYSTOSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT LEADS TO HIGHER RATE OF CBD INJURIES

CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS CHOLECYSTOSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT LEADS TO HIGHER RATE OF CBD INJURIES

Maria S Altieri, MD, MS, Jie Yang, PhD, Donglei Yin, MS, Salvatore Docimo, MD, Konstantinos Spaniolas, MD, Mark Talamini, MD, MBA, Aurora Pryor, MD. Stony Brook University Hospital

Introduction:  Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) placement is often the initial management of severe acute cholecystitis in the unstable patient.  PCT can be later reversed and cholecystectomy performed. The rate of cholecystectomy following PCT is not well characterized.  The purpose of this study is to investigate the rate of subsequent cholecystectomy and clinical factors associated with subsequent procedure.

Methods: The SPARCS, an administrative database, which captures all inpatient and outpatient procedures in the state of New York, was used to search all patients undergoing PCT placement between 2000-2012.  Patients age <18 years, missing information, lost-to-follow up, and with in-hospital deaths were excluded from the analysis.  Using a unique identifier all patients were followed for subsequent cholecystectomy procedures for at least two years.  Patients were also followed up for potential CBD injury during subsequent laparoscopic (LC) or open cholecystectomy (OC).  Chi-square tests with exact P-values based on Monte Carlo simulation, and multivariable logistic regression model were used to in the univariate and multivariable analysis, respectively.

Results:  Using ICD-9 and CPT codes, 9,738 patients were identified who underwent PTC placement in the time period.  The top five most common causes of PTC placement were coded as biliary tract disease (57.74%), followed by septicemia (14.9%), pancreatic disorders (2.68%), complications of surgical procedures and medical care (2.1%), and acute myocardial infarction (1.7%).  The rate of patients who had a PTC in 2000 to 2012, which subsequently underwent cholecystectomy increased from 25% in 2000 to 31.7% in 2012. In addition, patients undergoing subsequent LC increased from 11.8% in 2000 to 22.2% in 2012, while rate of OC decreased from 13.2% in 2000 to 9.5% in 2012.  After accounting for other possible confounding variables, younger male patients, who didn’t have any complications during PTC placement were more likely to undergo subsequent cholecystectomy (p<0.05).  Average time to LC was 122.02 days vs 159.64 days for OC (p-value <0.0001).   From the patients who underwent cholecystectomy following PTC, 47 patients experienced CBD injury (1.57%).

Conclusion:  Rate of cholecystectomy following PTC increased during the study period.  Surgeons seem to be increasingly comfortable performing LC as rate of LC increased from 11.8% to 22.2%.  However, rate of CBD injury is higher during subsequent cholecystectomy compared to that of the general population.  Caution should be used when performing subsequent cholecystectomy following PTC, as these procedures may be more technically challenging.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 88259

Program Number: S018

Presentation Session: Biliary Session

Presentation Type: Podium

129


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons