• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Assessing the Potential and Limitations of Laparoscopic Ultrasound in the Staging of Pancreatic Cancers

Assessing the Potential and Limitations of Laparoscopic Ultrasound in the Staging of Pancreatic Cancers

Introduction: Although the role of laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) during staging laparoscopy for pancreatic cancers is well established there is no consensus as to whether it provides useful information over and above other imaging modalities.

Aim: To evaluate the value of intra-operative LUS in the pre-operative assessment of pancreatic cancer.

Methods: A retrospective consecutive case series consisting of patients undergoing pre-operative staging for pancreatic carcinoma in two centres (Centre A and B) was carried out over a 5-year period (2000-05). It was routine practice to perform staging laparoscopy for pancreatic cancers considered potentially resectable on multi-planar CT. Staging laparoscopy was performed using a standardised 3-port protocol using a 30- degree laparoscope. Patients in Centre B also underwent LUS using a 7.5 MHz probe. All suspicious lesions were sent for histological assessment for confirmation of malignancy.

Results: There were 54 patients in centre A and 51 in Centre B. There were no differences between the two centres for patient demographics and tumour site. There was no difference between the two centres for the detection of metastatic disease using staging laparoscopic assessment alone (A-7.2% vs. B- 7.84%, p=1.0). However, there was a significant difference in additional findings (7.2% vs. 25%, p=0.037) with the use of LUS in Centre B. The additional findings (n=9) were portal vein involvement (n=5) and superior mesenteric vein involvement (n=3), stomach and liver metastasis (n=1) and local extension (n=1). These patients were offered palliative treatment. In the remaining 42 patients who were deemed suitable for resection, 5 patients were found to be inoperable during the laparotomy. 4 patients had an irresectable vascular pedicle involvement [Coeliac trunk (n=2), SMV (n=1), PV (n=1)]. One patient had diffuse metastatic disease (n=1).

Conclusion: The addition of LUS increased the detection rate of advanced disease by 17%, thus making it a useful pre-operative adjuvant staging modality. It is especially useful in assessing vascular involvement. In our series the false negative rate was 11% (n=5/42).


Session: Poster

Program Number: P398

View Poster

136


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons