• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / An Institutional Analysis of Hiatal Hernia Recurrence Rates and Contributing Factors

An Institutional Analysis of Hiatal Hernia Recurrence Rates and Contributing Factors

Herbert M Hedberg, MD1, Tyler Hall, BS2, John Linn, MD2, Stephen Haggerty2, Woody Denham, MD2, JoAnn Carbray2, Michael B Ujiki, MD2. 1University of Chicago Medical Center, 2NorthShore University HealthSystem

Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) is the treatment of choice for symptomatic hiatal hernia (HH). Mesh-reinforced curaplasty has considerably decreased recurrence rates for both large and small hernias, and newer synthetic absorbable meshes seem decrease rates even further. In this study, hiatal hernia repairs in an institutional database were analyzed for factors contributing to recurrence.

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Queried patients underwent LF from 2009 to 2016. Emergent operations, fundoplications after Heller myotomy, and individuals without HH were excluded. Demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared between the groups with Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, or Fisher’s Exact test. The cohort was also divided by groups according to mesh type (including no mesh). Comparisons were made among the groups using Chi-squared analysis.

A total of 249 patients were included in the analysis (no recurrence = 216, recurrence = 33). Demographic analysis revealed BMI to be significantly different (29.77 vs 27.79, respectively, p=0.04). Intraoperatively, the recurrence group had higher EBL (39.35ml vs 83ml, p=0.004) and intraoperative complication rate (0.93% vs 12.12%, p=0.003). Postoperatively, recurrence was associated with increased length of stay (52.35hrs vs 107.31hrs, p=0.03), increased time to activities of daily living (6.2 vs 9.13, p=0.03), ED visit within 30 days (8.8% vs 27.27%, p=0.005), and readmission within 30 days (5.09% vs 21.21%, p=0.004). Analyzing the cohort by mesh type, 94 patients received synthetic absorbable, 60 received biologic, and 94 received curaplasty without mesh. Recurrence rates for the respective groups were 8.51%, 16.67%, and 10.10%, although these differences were not significant (p=0.22). Time to recurrence was significantly different, respectively 0.81, 2.55, and 1.22 years (p=0.016).

Although this study was not powered to show lower recurrence rates with synthetic absorbable as compared to biologic, the 8.51% recurrence rate is consistent with other series utilizing this mesh. It is interesting to note the difference in time to recurrence. These results suggest that while synthetic absorbable mesh may result in lower recurrence rates, recurrence seems to occur earlier. The results also suggest that deconditioning (lower BMI), and difficult cases and/or recovery may predispose to recurrence. These findings can help inform LF mesh selection and predict which patients are at higher risk of recurrence.  


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 88415

Program Number: P424

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

41


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons