• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / AN ANALYSIS OF RESULTS IN A SINGLE-BLINDED, PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING NON-FIXATING VS. SELF-FIXATING MESH FOR LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR

AN ANALYSIS OF RESULTS IN A SINGLE-BLINDED, PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING NON-FIXATING VS. SELF-FIXATING MESH FOR LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR

Merritt Denham, BS, Brandon Johnson, BA, Michelle Leong, BA, Kristine Kuchta, MS, Eliza Conaty, BS, Michael Ujiki, MD, Woody Denham, MD, Stephen Haggerty, MD, JoAnn Carbray, BS, Mat Gitelis, BS, John Linn, MD. NorthShore University HealthSystem

Introduction: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) offers reduced postoperative pain and shorter convalescence compared to open repair, however it remains unclear whether the use of self-fixating mesh during LIHR might notably impact postoperative quality of life (QoL). We hypothesize that patients receiving self-fixating mesh during totally extraperitoneal (TEP) LIHR will report less pain and improved QoL compared to those receiving non-fixating mesh.

Methods: An IRB-approved, single-blinded randomized controlled trial was offered to patients with primary, unilateral inguinal hernias. Patients were randomized to receive either non-fixating (control) or self-fixating mesh. Clinical visits were conducted 3 weeks and 1 year after LIHR. A validated Surgical Outcomes Measurement System (SOMS) instrument was used to assess patients’ quality of life (QoL) preoperatively, and was also collected postoperatively along with the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at 3 weeks and 1 year after surgery. Comparisons between self-fixating and non-fixating mesh groups were made using Chi-Square, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum or Independent Samples T-Tests.

Results: The study enrolled 270 patients (137 non-fixating vs. 133 self-fixating). Preoperatively, there was no differences in mean age, BMI, or median hernia duration between the control and treatment groups (57.9 vs. 56.6 years, p=0.550; 26.1 vs. 26.8, p=0.534; 3.0 vs. 3.0 months, p=0.846). Median operative times (34 vs. 34 minutes, p=0.545), and LOS were similar for the groups. More patients in the non-fixating group received tacks (43 vs. 19, p=0.001), but the median number of tacks used was similar (5.4 tacks vs. 5.1, p=0.468). Patients receiving non-fixating mesh recorded significantly better (higher) mean SOMS scores for the first 3 days following surgery (Day 1: p=0.005; Day 2: p=0.002; Day 3: p=0.024, Table 1) indicative of less pain. Narcotic medication and NSAID use were similar between the groups.. No differences in pain were seen at 3 weeks or 1 year postoperatively, and CCS scores also did not differ between the groups at either time point (Table 1). There were zero recurrences found during clinical follow up in either of the groups.

Conclusion: Patients receiving self-fixating mesh report worse postoperative pain in the first 2-3 days after surgery than those receiving non-fixating mesh. Recurrence rates are similarly low for each group. The mesh groups showed no differences across a wide array of QoL metrics (SOMS and CCS) either at 3 weeks or 1 year postoperatively. Self-fixating mesh does not appear to positively impact pain-related QoL after TEP LIHR.

 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 88187

Program Number: S005

Presentation Session: Hernia Session

Presentation Type: Podium

45


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons