• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Cost and Effectiveness of Bipolar Vessel Sealers to Clips and Vascular Staplers in Straight Laparoscopic Colectomy

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Cost and Effectiveness of Bipolar Vessel Sealers to Clips and Vascular Staplers in Straight Laparoscopic Colectomy

Introduction: This study compares the costs and effectiveness of two standard techniques for vascular control in straight laparoscopic colectomy.
Methods: Patients scheduled for laparoscopic colectomy were randomized to bipolar vessel sealer (BVS; Ligasure Atlas, Covidien) or laparoscopic clips and vascular staplers (LCS). Time and ability to control the main vascular pedicles were recorded. Costs of disposable instruments were evaluated. Diagnosis, type and duration of procedure, body mass index (BMI), presence of adhesions, abscess or phlegmon, as well as estimated blood loss (EBL) were used to adjust multivariate regression models and evaluate effectiveness and costs.
Results: Of 59 randomized patients, there were 32 BVS and 27 LCS cases. Diagnosis, occurrence and severity of adhesions and abscess, median BMI (27kg/m2), operative time (170min), EBL (50ml), and length of stay (3 days) were similar between groups. Twenty right colectomies, 31 left colectomies and 8 total colectomies were performed for diverticulitis (16), neoplasia (33), and colitis (10). There were no conversions. Both diagnosis and procedure were significant predictors of the duration of surgery, while randomization to either group was not. An average of 2.4 laparoscopic clips and 1.6 vascular staplers were used per procedure in the LCS group. Overall, there was no significant difference in costs of disposable instruments. Two instruments failures occurred in the LCS arm, while one BVS had to be replaced (p=ns). BVS decreased operative time by 106 minutes (p=0.04) for total colectomies and by 33 minutes (p=0.04) for right colectomies. Moreover, the BVS reduced instrument costs by $446.9 in total colectomies and by $85.9 (p=0.07) in right colectomies. There were no significant differences in operative time and cost for left colectomies.
Conclusion: Bipolar vessel sealers do not change operative time or instrument cost for laparoscopic colectomy. BVS does significantly reduce the operative time and instrument cost for total and right colectomies and presents a better cost-effectiveness profile than laparoscopic clips and vascular staplers.


Session: Podium Presentation

Program Number: S122

154


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons