• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A Contemporary Analysis of Outcomes And Cost Data In Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Approaches Of Major Lung and Esophageal Surgery

A Contemporary Analysis of Outcomes And Cost Data In Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Approaches Of Major Lung and Esophageal Surgery

Jacob A Petrosky, MD, Ellen D Vogels, DO, Jai Prasad, MD, David M Parker, MD, Marcus Fluck, James T Dove, Matthew A Facktor, MD, Jon D Gabrielsen, MD, Anthony T Petrick, MD. Geisinger Medical Center

Introduction: A New England Journal Of Medicine Analysis of 900,000 Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS) procedures showed this approach increased costs by approximately $3,200 over Laparoscopy-Assisted (LA) surgery. We hypothesize experience has led to increased efficiency and reduced cost differential between approaches. Our objective was to contemporarily report outcomes on 30-day mortality, reoperation, total, fixed, and variable costs.

Method: 2001 patients underwent esophagus and thoracic procedures between November 2006 and July 2017. Patients were matched into cohorts by procedure type. Outcomes were analyzed using unpaired t-test and Fisher’s Exact test.

Results: Cost data was available for 447 patients undergoing RAS or LA procedures. Significant increases in equipment, labor, and overhead costs resulted with RAS vs. LA. Variable-labor and variable-overhead costs were significantly higher in LA procedures. Higher supply costs and longer procedure time was seen with RAS in all cohorts however, total 30-day costs were not significantly different in any group.

Conclusion: RAS led to significant increases in fixed, variable, and supply costs, yet overall 30-day costs were not statistically different when comparing RAS to conventional LA approaches.

Table-1.
  Esophagectomy     Major-Lung     Minor-Lung    
  LA
N=11
RAS
N=18
P-value LA N=297 RAS N=32 P-value LA N=63 RAS N=26  
30-day-Cost

49,777

57,927 0.3354 27,191 21,820 0.9711 21,541 14,105 0.9748

Direct-Equipment

1,939 2,094 0.5545 1,202 1,165 0.4107 945 708 0.0065

Direct-Labor

3,084 3,117

0.9547

1,466

996

0.3352 1,159 558 0.0318

Direct-Overhead

1,591

2,027 0.1766 861 947 0.0031 672 586 0.0904
Variable-Labor 9,768 10,844 0.5805 5,647 3,392 0.0018 4,507 1,887 0.001

Variable-Overhead
 

3,394 3,501 0.8607 1,939 1,136 0.0013 1,584 630 0.0004

Supply

9,897

14,480 0.0197 4,913 5,466 0.0024 3,834 4,445 0.0005

Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 86884

Program Number: P786

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

9


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons