• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A Comparative Study for the Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Adrenalectomies (Transperitoneal Approach vs. Posterior Retroperitoneal Approach) for Small Adrenal Tumors

A Comparative Study for the Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Adrenalectomies (Transperitoneal Approach vs. Posterior Retroperitoneal Approach) for Small Adrenal Tumors

Sang-Wook Kang, MD, Jong Ju Jeong, MD, Woong Youn Chung, MD. Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Backgrounds: With the development of endoscopic instruments and minimally invasive techniques, the laparoscopic adrenalectomy has been the gold standards for the surgical treatment of small adrenal tumors. Several approaching routes for laparoscopic adrenalectomy such as transperitoneal (TPA), lateral retroperitoneal or posterior retroperitoneal accesses (PRA) are being used according to the surgeon’s preference. PRA has several superior benefits comparing to the others in terms of direct and short access to the target organ, no trespass and irritation of intraperitoneal space, no need of retracting adjacent organs, and safety and ease for learning this method. Recently, we have experienced PRA for several cases of small adrenal tumor. In this study, detailed methods and preliminary results will be introduced.
Patients and Method: From Jan. 2009 to July. 2010, a total of 58 patient had been performed adrenalectomies in the endocrine surgery department. Among them, open adrenlaectomy and robotic adrenalectomy were performed in 5 and 10 patients, respectively. Forty-three patients had undergone laparoscopic adrenalectomy, and transperitoneal approach (TPA) and PRA were conducted in 26 and 17 patients, respectively. We have evaluated and compared the clinico-pathologic data and surgical outcomes of the two groups retrospectively.
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, lesion side, the volume of blood loss, and tumor size. Cushing syndrome, primary aldosteronism, pheochromocytoma, and non-functioning adrenal tumor were in 3, 4, 8, and 11 patients in TPA group and 2, 7, 2, and 6 patients in PRA group, respectively. Mean operative time of PRA was shorter than that of TPA (TPA : 116.2 ± 52.5 Vs. PRA : 87.2 ± 27.6min., p = 0.043). Average time to oral intake and postoperative hospital stay of PRA also showed shorter results comparing to the TPA (TPA : 1.19 ± 0.49 Vs. PRA : 0.88 ± 0.33 days, p = 0.028. TPA : 5.96 ± 3.56 Vs. PRA : 3.00 ± 1.37days, p = 0.002, respectively). The mean numbers of analgesics use for pain control was fewer in the PRA group (TPA : 3.81 ± 3.23 Vs. PRA : 1.29 ± 1.21 times, p = 0.001). There was no conversion to open surgery and postoperative complications.
Conclusions: In our initial experiences, the posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and fast procedure. Ordinal anatomical dissection in the bloodless planes provides a clear operative field and avoids inadvertent injury to surrounding organs and major vessels. Thus, it decreases the complication rate with a significantly short operative time. In experienced hands, this method can be an ideal approach in adrenal surgery.
 


Session: Emerging Technology Poster
Program Number: ETP007
View Poster

206


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons