• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A 5 year, single center experience with robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

A 5 year, single center experience with robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Michael Passeri, William Lyman, Amit Sastry, Allyson Cochrane, David Iannitti, Dionisios Vrochides, Erin Baker, John Martinie. Carolinas Medical Center

Background: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is emerging as an alternative to the traditional open technique for selected patients. The laparoscopic approach has become a viable option, but is somewhat limited by the technical complexity of the procedure, especially the reconstructive phase, which requires meticulous placement of fine sutures into delicate parenchyma and ductal structures.  The robotic platform addresses many of these concerns by offering optical magnification, augmented instrument articulation, and overall greater precision with suture targeting.  The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of robotic PD at our institution since the procedure was introduced in 2012, and how the number of cases converted to open evolved as surgeons progressed along the learning curve.

Methods: Using the Department of HPB Surgery REDCap data repository, we compiled a list of all patients who underwent robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy since we started performing the procedure in 2012.  We then dichotomized the resulting 72 patients in early and late groups.  Postoperative outcomes were evaluated for those cases that were completed robotically, with emphasis on operative time, estimated blood loss, margins on malignant specimens, number of nodes excised, positive node ratio, length of stay after operation, and postoperative complication rates.

Results: A total of 72 robotic PDs were attempted.  Of those, 16 (22%) were converted to open.  Of the 36 in the early group, 11 (30.6%) were converted.  Of the 36 in the late group, that number dropped to 5 (13.9%). Of the 56 cases that were completed robotically, 11 were performed for benign disease, while 45 were performed to excise malignant/premalignant lesions. Of those 45, R0 resection was achieved in 34 (75.6%).  Median number of nodes retrieved was 18, with a positive node ratio of 0.09. Median estimated blood loss was 300cc.  Median OR time was 419 minutes. Median length of stay was 8 days.  Grade B or C pancreatic fistula occurred in 7.2% of cases.  

Discussion: This study demonstrates that approaching PD with a robotic platform is a viable strategy in the setting of either benign or malignant disease. Conversion rates can be expected to decline as surgeons progress along the learning curve and gain familiarity with the robotic technique.  The complication profile and safety metrics of cases completed robotically are in line with the standards of open PD.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 86492

Program Number: S051

Presentation Session: Robotics 1 Session

Presentation Type: Podium

40


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons