• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Prevention of Port Site Hernia After Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy

Prevention of Port Site Hernia After Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy

Kazuteru Watanabe, Shoichi Fujii, Hirokazu Suwa, Kenji Tatsumi, Mitsuyoshi Ota, Chikara Kunisaki, Yasushi Ichikawa, Itaru Endo. Yokohama City University Medical Center, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama, Japan

Background Although laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection is becoming increasingly popular, port site hernia (PSH) has remained a problem for surgeon following laparoscopic surgery. It worsens satisfaction and the quality of life of the patients. No studies have specifically investigated the use of a GraNeeTM Needle and R-MedTM Plug system (the GraNee Needle system) in this surgical procedure. Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine the incidence of PSH using a grasping needle in a cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in comparison with standard closure.
Methods We enrolled 672 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection between June 1993 and December 2008. The GraNee Needle system was introduced into the operation from April 2001 (GraNee Group ; N=388). Prior to this, standard closure was carried out via the defect through the skin wound once the pneumoperitoneum has been released and the port removed (Standard closure group ; N=221). Patient and tumor characteristics, and complication details were extracted from case records retrospectively and used to identify patients who developed PSH.
Results The median follow-up periods of standard closure group and Granee Needle group were 52.4 (12-167) and 38.3 (12-128) months, respectively. There were two incidences of PSH in the standard group (1.0 %) and none in the GraNee Needle group.
Conclusion No postoperative hernias occurred at any of the trocar sites after GraNee Needle system was used. This method is quick, safe ,and provides adequate closure of the fascia and peritoneum which can be confirmed by intraperitoneal inspection. These benefits could also be realized in other laparoscopic procedures.


Session: Poster
Program Number: P156
View Poster

481


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons