• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / TOO OLD, TOO SICK, TOO LATE: DISPARITY IN ACCESS TO BARIATRIC SURGERY AMONG AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN

TOO OLD, TOO SICK, TOO LATE: DISPARITY IN ACCESS TO BARIATRIC SURGERY AMONG AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN

Katia Noyes, PhD, MPH1, Monami Majumdar, MPH2, Ajay A Myneni, MBBS, PhD, MPH2, Heather Orom, PhD3, Steven D Schwaitzberg, MD2, Aaron B Hoffman, MD, FACS2. 1Division of Health Services Policy and Practice, Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, 2Department of Surgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 3Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the differences in access to bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) among gender and racial subgroups to develop patient-centered, culturally appropriate and cost-effective interventions to overcome barriers to care. Technological advances have transformed BMS into a safe and highly effective procedure for dramatic weight loss and lowering burden of obesity-related disorders (type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular and renal diseases). African American patients are at greater risk for early onset of these comorbidities and greater disease severity. Across all races, men are far less likely to undergo BMS compared to women.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We utilized the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) registry database, which has a comprehensive collection of pre-, peri- and post-operative factors on patients who underwent BMS (n = 165,424). We tested the differences in receipt of BMS, comorbidities and complications between the racial and gender subgroups using chi-square tests and used logistic regression to conduct multivariate analyses.

RESULTS: Our study sample consisted of 74.9% Whites and 16.7% African Americans. White women were most likely to undergo BMS (58.7%) followed by White men (16.2%), African American women (14.4%) and African American men (2.2%). A closer examination of the patient characteristics among men revealed that despite being younger, African American men (mean age of 44.1 years compared to 47.8 years among White men, P <0.01) were more likely to have a history of hypertension (P <0.01), renal insufficiency (P <0.01), required dialysis (P <0.01) and had a higher ASA score (P <0.01). Furthermore, they were more likely to stay in the hospital for more than 4 days after BMS [odds ratio (OR) = 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21–1.78), and to suffer from post-operative complications (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02-1.64).

CONCLUSIONS: African American men are at significant disadvantage in accessing BMS compared to White men and African American women, despite being eligible both on the grounds of BMI and related comorbidity. Further research is necessary to understand and address individual, provider-level, and societal barriers to BMS among African American men. Further, it may be prudent to refer African American men for BMS at a much younger age compared to White men, as it may reduce the prevalence and severity of obesity-related disorders and post-operative complications as well as lessen the financial burden in this population.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95499

Program Number: S167

Presentation Session: Disparities

Presentation Type: Podium

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search