• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / The utility of MII testing in making surgical decisions

The utility of MII testing in making surgical decisions

Matt Glasgow1, Christy M Dunst, MD2, Walaa Abdelmoaty, MD3, Rosen Ilchev, BA3, Naly Setthavongsack4, Hannah Creasey5, Daniel Davilla Bradley, MD2, Kevin M Reavis, MD2, Lee L Swanstrom, MD2, Steve R Demeester, MD2. 1Bates College, 2The Oregon Clinic, 3Providence Portland Medical Center, 4Portland State University, 5Lewis and Clark College

Introduction: Abnormal esophageal acid exposure, as measured by prolonged pH-testing, has long been considered the gold standard in the diagnosis of GERD. Importantly, an abnormally elevated acid score provides one of the most accurate predictors of a successful surgical outcome. Impedance technology has been applied to esophageal testing to quantitate the presence reflux regardless of chemical composition. Currently, combined multichannel-intraluminal impedance and standard pH-testing (MII-pH) has become common practice but little is known about the impact on surgical decision making. The aim of this study was to determine if an isolated abnormal esophageal impedance test is an adequate indication for antireflux surgery.

Methods: Patients who had an off-medication MII-pH test followed by antireflux surgery over 5 years were reviewed. Patients with abnormal impedance were selected.  Only patients with standard antireflux surgery were included (fundoplication/type 1 hiatal hernia repair). An abnormal pH-test was defined as DeMeester score > 14.7. An abnormal impedance test was defined as > 47 reflux events. Patients were divided into two groups: abnormal pH/abnormal impedance [pH+MII+] and normal pH/abnormal impedance [pH–MII+]. Patients were contacted by telephone for a postoperative interview. Patients were asked to rate their symptom resolution on a scale of 1 (no resolution) to 5 (complete resolution).

Results: Eighty-two patients met criteria: 44 [pH+MII+] and 38 [pH–MII+] There were no differences in the baseline demographics or indications for surgery between the groups. Both groups experienced significant reduction in symptoms with overall symptom resolution score 4.19. The mean symptom resolution score was lower for the [pH–MII+] group than the [pH+MII+] (3.95 vs. 4.41, p < 0.05).  Preoperative regurgitation or hiatal hernia specifically did not increase the likelihood of a successful outcome.

Discussion: Isolated abnormal esophageal impedance off medication is an adequate indication for antireflux surgery. Patients who have abnormal esophageal acid scores on preoperative pH-testing have slightly improved outcomes compared to those who have abnormal impedance alone, specifically regarding heartburn and dysphagia. Preoperative factors such as regurgitation or hiatal hernias were not associated with further improvement in outcomes.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95430

Program Number: S047

Presentation Session: Foregut II – Physiology

Presentation Type: Podium

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search