• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • SAGES Store
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES Video Subscription
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
    • Fellows Career Development Course
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
    • SAGES Pearls
    • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy
    • SAGES Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • OWLS / FLS
  • Log In

The perforation of the GB in cases of incidental GB cancer: Indication for the use of retrieval bags?

Introduction: The accidental intraoperative perforation of the gallbladder is a problem of the laparoscopic surgery, if an incidental gallbladder carcinoma exists at the time of operation.
According to the literature this complication comes up to 30% of the laparoscopic operations.
In order to prevent the dissemination of tumour cells the use of an isolation bag is proclaimed.
The question is if the intraoperative perforation of gallbladder carcinoma really leads to a prognostic deterioration and if the patients which have been treated with an isolation bag have an prognostic advantage.
Material and method: To obtain data we are using the data of the German- registry of incidental gallbladder carcinoma, which is supported by the German Society of Surgery.
We are collecting our data with a standarized questionaire, which has been sent to all german and now to all austrian surgical clinics as well.
In a period of 3 months we are actualizing the data.
Results: 606 cases of incidental gallbladder carcinomas are registered.
335 were operated laparoscopically, 105(31.3%) of them get a relapse of the tumour.
180 patients were treated with the support of an isolation bag, the rate of a relapse was 35% (n= 63).
155 of the laparoscopic group have treated without a isolation bag, the rate of an relapse was 27% (n= 42).
In 73 of 335 laparoscopic treated patients there was an intraoperative accidental opening of the organ, the rate of a relapse was 39.7% (n= 29).
In 51 of 73 cases an isolation bag was used, the rate of a relapse was 41.2% (n= 21).
The other 22 of 73 patients who were operated without an isolation bag have a rate of relapse of 36.4%(n=8).
The group without an intraoperative perforation (n= 262) have 29.0% (n=76) of tumour reccurence.
129 of this 262 were treated with the use of an isolation bag, 42 (32.6%) of them had a tumour reccurence, the other 133 of the 262 patients treated without a bag had a recurrence rate of 25.6% (n= 34).
Discussion: In our registry, the intraoperative perforation leads to a significant prognostic disadvantage(p=0.046 Fisher`s exact test).
The patients treated with an isolation bag have a tendency of a higher rate of tumour recurrences (p= 0,055 Fisher`s exact test), but the isolation bag was used significantly more often in cases of gallbladder perforation, nevertheless the recurrence rate is higher in patients without a intraoperativ perforation treated with the use of an isolation bag compared with those treated without a bag. The reasons therefore have to be discussed.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P489

View Poster

1,054

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related



  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons