• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / The perforation of the GB in cases of incidental GB cancer: Indication for the use of retrieval bags?

The perforation of the GB in cases of incidental GB cancer: Indication for the use of retrieval bags?

Introduction: The accidental intraoperative perforation of the gallbladder is a problem of the laparoscopic surgery, if an incidental gallbladder carcinoma exists at the time of operation.
According to the literature this complication comes up to 30% of the laparoscopic operations.
In order to prevent the dissemination of tumour cells the use of an isolation bag is proclaimed.
The question is if the intraoperative perforation of gallbladder carcinoma really leads to a prognostic deterioration and if the patients which have been treated with an isolation bag have an prognostic advantage.
Material and method: To obtain data we are using the data of the German- registry of incidental gallbladder carcinoma, which is supported by the German Society of Surgery.
We are collecting our data with a standarized questionaire, which has been sent to all german and now to all austrian surgical clinics as well.
In a period of 3 months we are actualizing the data.
Results: 606 cases of incidental gallbladder carcinomas are registered.
335 were operated laparoscopically, 105(31.3%) of them get a relapse of the tumour.
180 patients were treated with the support of an isolation bag, the rate of a relapse was 35% (n= 63).
155 of the laparoscopic group have treated without a isolation bag, the rate of an relapse was 27% (n= 42).
In 73 of 335 laparoscopic treated patients there was an intraoperative accidental opening of the organ, the rate of a relapse was 39.7% (n= 29).
In 51 of 73 cases an isolation bag was used, the rate of a relapse was 41.2% (n= 21).
The other 22 of 73 patients who were operated without an isolation bag have a rate of relapse of 36.4%(n=8).
The group without an intraoperative perforation (n= 262) have 29.0% (n=76) of tumour reccurence.
129 of this 262 were treated with the use of an isolation bag, 42 (32.6%) of them had a tumour reccurence, the other 133 of the 262 patients treated without a bag had a recurrence rate of 25.6% (n= 34).
Discussion: In our registry, the intraoperative perforation leads to a significant prognostic disadvantage(p=0.046 Fisher`s exact test).
The patients treated with an isolation bag have a tendency of a higher rate of tumour recurrences (p= 0,055 Fisher`s exact test), but the isolation bag was used significantly more often in cases of gallbladder perforation, nevertheless the recurrence rate is higher in patients without a intraoperativ perforation treated with the use of an isolation bag compared with those treated without a bag. The reasons therefore have to be discussed.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P489

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search