• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / The Comparison of Component Separation Technique (CST) Versus No Component Separation Technique in the Repair of Large Ventral Hernias

The Comparison of Component Separation Technique (CST) Versus No Component Separation Technique in the Repair of Large Ventral Hernias

Sean R Maloney, Kathryn A Schlosser, Tanushree Prasad, Paul D Colavita, Kent W Kercher, Vedra A Augenstein, B. Todd Heniford. Carolinas Medical Center

Introduction: CST allows mobilization of the abdominal wall to allow in an attempt to close the midline fascia. This technique has been associated with increased wound complications. The aim of this study is to compare operative outcomes and quality of life (QOL) after CST versus No-CST in large, preperitoneal ventral hernia repairs (PPVHR).

Methods: A prospective, single institution hernia study examined all patients undergoing PPVHR with synthetic mesh. Emergency and contaminated operations were excluded. A case control cohort with similar BMI, sex, and defect size was identified using propensity score matching technique from cases with No-CST. QOL was assessed using the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS).

Results: There were 340 cases with CST included for case control. The algorithm was able to match 113 CST cases to 113 No-CST cases. The groups (CST vs No-CST) were similar regarding age (59.8±12.3 vs 58.6±12.4years, p0.5), BMI (32.4±5.8 vs 32.9±6.7kg/m2, p0.901), diabetes (22.3 vs 31.0, p0.142), smoking (13.3 vs 13.3, p1.0), defect size (196.1±118.3 vs 198.1±122.6cm2, p0.9), mesh size (956.9±237.0 vs 966.5±219.6cm2, p0.7), and follow up time (21.3±22.2 vs 20.7±23.2 months, p0.6). In univariate analysis, there was no difference in recurrence between the CST and no-CST groups (0.9% vs 0.9%, p1.000) or mesh infection (0.9% vs 0.0%, p0.5). CST did have more wound complications (29.2% vs 16.1%, p0.02). Controlling for panniculectomy and diabetes with multivariate logistic regression, CST had an increased risk for wound complications (OR 2.27, CI 1.16-4.47).

QOL was routinely assessed. The groups were similar pre-operatively with 76.3% of CST patients and 77.8% of No-CST patients having pain (p0.890). At 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-operatively, the groups had equal QOL as measured by pain and movement limitations.

Conclusions: In large ventral hernias, CST can be helpful in allowing successful fascial closure. While CST with mesh results in an increased rate of wound complications, CST should be performed when necessary to achieve fascial closure, as the recurrence rates are equal to similarly sized hernias that have successful fascial closure without CST.  Additionally, in the largest QOL comparative study to date, CST does not negatively impact patient QOL in the repair of large ventral hernias short or long term.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95028

Program Number: S025

Presentation Session: Complex Abdominal Wall Hernia

Presentation Type: Podium

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search