• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Systematic review of laparoscopic partial splenectomies in adults

Systematic review of laparoscopic partial splenectomies in adults

Noeline Rajarajan, Julie Pepe, Paula Veldhuis, Sebastian De La Fuente. Florida Hospital Orlando

Introduction: Laparoscopic total splenectomy continues to be the operation of choice for lesions of the spleen. Total removal of the spleen, however, can result in severe early and late complications. Preservation of splenic parenchyma has been increasingly desired particularly when research has shown that only 20-30 percent is required to fulfill its immunological function and prevent the complications associated with asplenia. Laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) continues to remain a marginally performed procedure and, despite its perceived benefits, the literature is still scare. In this study, we reviewed the current literature and discuss the feasibility of partial laparoscopic and robotic splenectomies.

Methods: A literature search was conducted on August 2017 for LPS using PubMed, Ovid, Clinical Key and Cochrane Library. The results were limited to material published from 2010-present, case reviews and studies which contained 2 or more patients, patients > 13 years old. Demographic data, pathology of lesion, surgical technique, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion requirement, conversion rates and complications of surgery were extracted.

Results: From the 28 publications that were retrieved after review, only 9 fulfilled the criteria for LPS. The total number of patients who underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy were 85 (39 males and 46 females). The main pathologies encountered included cysts (n= 24) hemangiomas (n=21), and trauma (n=21). The remaining etiologies comprised lymphangiomas, hamartomas, metastasis, metaplasia and an abscess. The mean operative time for a LPS was 144 minutes with documented times ranging from 80 to 226 minutes. Average blood loss in the LPS group was 243 cc (elective cases 274 cc vs. emergency cases 174 cc). Despite this blood loss only 6% of elective cases required blood transfusion (4/60).  Complications were seen in 16% of patients, 7% had fluid, 9% included atelectasis in 2 patients, one patient who developed a pulmonary embolism and one patient developed a venous thrombosis.  Conversion to total laparoscopic splenectomy was 6% (5% in the elective LPS group and 9.5% in the emergency group). There was only patient converted to an open approach.

Conclusion: Minimally invasive partial splenectomy is a safe surgical procedure in both elective and emergency settings in selected patients and should be restricted to benign etiologies. LPS allows for preservation of the spleen with acceptable post-operative complications. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95714

Program Number: P456

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search