• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Subcutaneous endoscopic assisted ligation for inguinal hernia repairs in children – first large US experience and matched comparison with open hernia repair

Subcutaneous endoscopic assisted ligation for inguinal hernia repairs in children – first large US experience and matched comparison with open hernia repair

Raghavendra Rao, MD, Michael Smith, Troy Markel, MD, Brian Gray, MD, Matthew Landman, MD. IU

Introduction: The subcutaneous endoscopic assisted ligation (SEAL) is a technique of pediatric laparoscopic hernia repair which has recently been incorporated by pediatric surgeons. This technical details of SEAL remain controversial. We present the outcomes of our large experience with this technique in comparison with open inguinal hernia repairs (OHR) in the pediatric population.

Methods: Demographic data, operative times, operative details and recurrence/complication rates were retrospectively reviewed for both the SEAL and OHR done between Jan-2017 to Sept-2018. Non-parametric tests were used to detect differences, and p<=0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. SEAL was performed as previously described in a rabbit model along with fulguration of sac[1]. Matching was done using propensity-score analysis.

Results: There were 213 OHRs and 90 SEAL procedures during the study period(Table).

For OHR, laparoscopic-look was performed in 23%. When successful, it revealed a contralateral PPV (patent processus-vaginalis) in 41% of cases, all of which were repaired. For the SEAL procedures, a contralateral PPV was found in 25%, all of which were repaired. There were no intraoperative complications for either technique.

OHRs had a recurrence rate of 0.4% (n=1) and 1.4% metachronous hernias (n=3). No patient had a lap look in the patients with metachronous hernias. SEAL repairs had 3 recurrences (3.3%,p=0.08). The post op complication rate for OHR was 2.8% [postoperative pain-2.3% and infection-0.4%]. There were 4 post-op complications with the SEAL technique (4.4%,p=0.6). Two of them were incisional infections, 1 a prominent retained suture and fourth excessive granulation at the umbilical trocar site.

90 SEAL procedures were matched to 90 OHRs using propensity-score analysis based on age, sex, follow-up time, hernia side, repair of contralateral-hernia and number of additional procedures. There were no differences in recurrence-rates (1 vs. 3 in OHR and SEAL respectively,p=0.6), complication-rates (1 vs. 4 in OHR and SEAL respectively,p=0.4) and OR-time [44.5 vs. 43 min in OHR and SEAL respectively,p=0.8].

Conclusions: The SEAL has similar OR-time and outcomes compared to OHR. Contralateral PPVs are very common and lead to metachronous hernias. SEAL has the advantage of more easily being able to detect contralateral PPVs and involves little cord dissection. Our study was limited by short follow-up. Greater experience should lead to better outcomes with SEAL.

  OHR SEAL
N 213 90
Isolated hernia repairs  162(76%) 55(61%)*
Age(median[IQR] days) 420[96-1936]

149[95-673] **

Sex(female%) 23 23
Additional Procedure(%) 24 39*
Follow-up(median [IQR] days) 29[1.0-189] 41.5[2.0-149.8]
OR-time(median[IQR] min) 39[28-63] 43[36-64.3]*

Index side of hernia(%)

Left

Right

Bilateral

 

31

51

18

 

38***

42

20

OR-time of Isolated hernia repairs (median[IQR] min) 35[26-49] 38[32-45]

*p<0.05.**p<0.005.***p<0.001

[1]Bruns NE et-al. Assessing the Adequacy of Absorbable Braided Suture for Laparoscopic High Ligation in Rabbits. J-Laparoendosc-Adv-Surg-Tech A.2017 Jul;27(7):733-736


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 98648

Program Number: ETP747

Presentation Session: Emerging Technology Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search