• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Safety and Feasibility of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Conventional Instruments in a Rural Hospital

Safety and Feasibility of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Conventional Instruments in a Rural Hospital

Pankaj Garg, MBBS MS, Jai D Thakur, MBBS, N S Aneja, MBBS MS. SGHKS Charitable Hospital, Sohana, Punjab, India, Alchemist Hospital, Panchkula, India

Background– Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is the recent addition to the world of endoscopic surgery. SILS Cholecystectomy (SILS-C) has been reported to have morbidity and complications comparable to the four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC), while having obvious cosmetic benefits at the same time. We report our initial experience with SILS-C in a low-cost rural setting with conventional straight instruments.
Methods – 21 patients (18 women, 3 men) were prospectively enrolled in the study. All the operations were done in a rural welfare hospital in North India. The operations were carried out in a low cost set-up with basic facilities (single chip camera, non-xenon halogen light source, 0 degree-10mm scope, 10mm clip applicator) and conventional straight instruments. SILS-C was done through a transumbilical incision (2.3- 2.7 cm) and 3 ports (one 10 mm and two 5 mm) were introduced separately through the incision. The surgery was done by utilizing 1-3 retracting sutures through the abdominal wall. After dissecting cystic duct and artery, one of the 5-mm trocar was replaced with a 10-mm trocar, through which a 10-mm clip applicator was used. The post operative pain scores at 6 hrs, 24 hrs and 1 week were registered using visual analogue scores (VAS). Along with this, post operative nausea, vomiting, commencement of oral intake, hospital stay, days taken to resume normal activities, days taken to return back to professional work and satisfaction scores (scale of 1-5) were noted. The only exclusion criteria were ASA(American Society of Anesthesiology) grade>2 and failure to take a consent.
Results– The mean age in SILS-C was 44.2±14.1yrs. The history of acute cholecystitis was present in 33% (7/21), jaundice in 0, pancreatitis in 5%(1/21) and ultrasonic findings of acute cholecystitis in 14%(3/21) patients. Hypertension was present in 33%(7/21) and diabetes in 5%(1/21). Single large stone was present in 14%(3/21) and multiple small stones in 86%(18/21) patients. The operating time was 69.23±24.0 min and average length of incision was 2.57±0.08 cms. 14%(3/21) required introduction of additional trocars(conversion)- two due to dense adhesions and one due to a large left lobe of liver leading to difficult exposure of calot’s triangle. None of the patients required conversion to open. The post operative pain scores at 6 hrs, 24 hrs and 1 week were 1.81±1.4, 1.61±0.8, 1.21±0.5 respectively. Oral intake was commenced successfully in 5.8±0.6 hrs, no patient had vomiting and 25%(5/21) experienced post operative nausea. The average days of admission were 1.09±0.43 days. The days taken to resume normal day to day activities were 7.23±3.5 days and days taken to resume professional work were 21.28±5.1 days. The satisfaction scores at one month post operation were 4.94±0.2 (out of 5). The wound infection occurred in 14%(3/21) patients causing significant morbidity (dressing >15 days). There was no major (biliary tract or bowel) complication in any of the patients.
Conclusions– SILS-Cholecystectomy is a safe and viable option, even in low cost rural settings. It can be performed with low level of morbidity while having excellent cosmetic result and high satisfaction levels.


Session: Poster
Program Number: P217
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals