• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Canadian Perspective

Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Canadian Perspective

Moska Hamidi, MD, MPH, FRCSC1, Jensen Tan, MD, MSc, FRCSC2, Lazar Klein, MD, MSc, FRCSC2, Steven Maclellan, MD, FRCSC2. 1Department of Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, 2Department of Surgery, Humber River Hospital

Background:Minimally invasive ventral hernia repair is increasingly prevalent in Canada;however, the uptake of robotic assisted ventral hernia repair (RAVHR) has been slow compared to other countries.The open approach continues to be widely used for complex hernia repairs requiring components separation,despite a lower incidence of SSI and comparable recurrence rates with a minimally invasive repair.Given the reported success of RAVHR as a minimally invasive approach to these hernias, we sought to determine the feasibility of its routine use in a community hospital setting.There is currently no other Canadian experience reported on RAVHR.This report describes our initial series.

Methods:We included all RAVHR performed at our institution, between Nov 2017-July 2018.We reviewed 30-day complications,mortality, LOS, opiates prescribed and operating time. A two-way scatter plot was used to describe the relationship between hernia size,number of cases performed and operating times.

Results:Eighteen patients from our institution performed by two robotic surgeons were analyzed.Mean follow-up period was 57 days.The mean age of our patients was 56 years (31-79),with the majority being male (n=12; 67%).All patients had an attempted RAVHR, with one patient (6%) requiring a conventional laparoscopic repair.The average BMI was 30.13 (22.9-37).The mean defect size was 5.4cm in maximal transverse diameter (2.5-15 cm)and all hernia defects were closed primarily.Fourteen patients (78%) received a retrorectus mesh repair and 3 patients (16.7%) received a component separation.The mean length of stay (LOS) was 1.28 days.The mean number of opiates prescribed at discharge was 16 tablets of Morphine 5 mg equivalents.There was one bowel injury (6%),and one paralytic ileus (6%) in the same patient.There were no readmissions or mortalities. One patient developed an abscess at the umbilicus.The mean operating time was 223 minutes (118-516 min);there was no significant change in operating time with increasing experience,as the hernia size varied, and sample size is limited. Pearson coefficient demonstrate the relationship between the hernia size and operating time, with a correlation of 0.65 (Figure 1).

Conclusion: The outcomes from our first series of RAVHR are consistent with previously published studies with respect to LOS and complication rates.Outcomes are also encouraging for using RAVHR for larger hernias requiring components separation.We have demonstrated the safety of this approach in a Community hospital setting in Canada.Our future study will assess the safety and cost-effectiveness of this approach in complex abdominal wall reconstruction with component separation as an alternative to open surgery in select populations.

Figure 1-Pearson Correlation Hernia Size vs. OR time


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95585

Program Number: P653

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search