• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Risk factors and outcomes for bleeding following bariatric surgery: results from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)

Risk factors and outcomes for bleeding following bariatric surgery: results from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)

Aimal Khan, MD, Katey Feng, MPH, Richard D Stahl, MD, Abhishek D Parmar, MD, MS, Jayleen M Grams, MD, PhD. University of Alabama at Birmingham

Introduction: Bleeding following bariatric surgery can be a life-threatening complication. Here, we aimed to evaluate risk factors and outcomes of patients with postoperative bleeding using a national database from accredited bariatric centers.

Methods: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) databases for 2015-2016 were used to identify patients with postoperative bleeding following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Patients undergoing emergency or revisional surgery or had their approach converted intraoperatively were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for postoperative bleeding.

Results: A total of 326,841 patients underwent either SG (70%) or RYGB (30%). Of these, 1,592 (0.5%) had postsurgical bleeding. RYGB were more likely to have a bleeding complication than SG (AOR 2.7, 95% CI= 2.375-2.982, p< 0001). Other factors associated with increased risk of postoperative bleeding included preoperative therapeutic anticoagulation (AOR 3.6, 95% CI= 3.017-4.338, p< 0.0001), history of pulmonary thromboembolism (AOR 1.4, 95% CI= 1.047-1.849, p=0.0227) or deep venous thrombosis (AOR 1.3, 95% CI= 1.002-1.670, p= 0.0479), renal insufficiency (AOR 2.8, 95% CI= 2.030-3.801, p< 0.0001), hypertension (AOR 1.2, 95% CI= 1.028-1.287, p= 0.0147), diabetes (AOR 1.2, 95% CI= 1.086-1.355, p= 0.0006), gastroesophageal reflux disease (AOR 1.1, 95% CI= 1.028-1.265, p=0.0130), obstructive sleep apnea (AOR 1.3, 95% CI= 1.028-1.272, p= 0.0132), and male sex (AOR 1.6, 95% CI= 1.429-1.789, p< 0.0001). ASA class, anastomotic or staple line provocative testing, and placement of a surgical drain were not associated with postoperative bleeding. On subgroup analysis of SG patients, use of staple line reinforcement material (AOR 0.722, 95% CI= 0.612-0.852, p=0.0001), over-sewing of the staple line (AOR 0.791, 95% CI= 0.646-0.969, p=0.0234), and increased distance of the staple line from the pylorus (AOR 0.933, 95% CI= 0.878-0.991, p=0.0232) were all associated with decreased risk of postoperative bleeding. Larger sleeve bougie sizes were associated with increased risk of postoperative bleeding (AOR 1.031, 95% CI= 1.010-1.052, p=0.0037). Patients with postoperative bleeding had significantly higher rates of unplanned admission to the ICU (25.25% vs 0.82%, p<0.0001), increased length of stay (4.15 days vs 1.82 days, p<0.0001) and mortality (1.82% vs 0.11%, p<0.0001).

Conclusions: The overall rate of bleeding following index bariatric surgery is lower than previously thought. Numerous patient- and operation-specific risk factors for postoperative bleeding are identified and may be useful for improving risk stratification, patient counseling, and development of processes to reduce the risk of postoperative bleeding.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95380

Program Number: P187

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search