• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Prospective evaluation of low insufflation pressure cholecystectomy using an insufflation management system versus standard CO2 pneumoperitoneum

Prospective evaluation of low insufflation pressure cholecystectomy using an insufflation management system versus standard CO2 pneumoperitoneum

Rashid Kikhia, MD1, Kristie Price1, Vamsi Alli, MD2, Aurora Pryor, MD1, Gerald Gracia1, Jerry Rubano, MD1, Jessica Schnur1, Dana Telem, MD3. 1Stony Brook Medicine, 2Penn State, 3University of Michigan

Background: Pneumoperitoneum produces significant hemodynamic and cardiopulmonary changes. At present abdominal insufflation to 15mmHg is standard during laparoscopy; however, even at that accepted pressure studies demonstrate increased mean end tidal CO2 (etCO2) and airway pressures. Thus, operating at reduced pressure may confer physiologic benefits. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of operating at a lower intra-abdominal pressure as well as the potential value of an insufflation management system versus conventional C02 insufflation to maintain these pressures.

Methods: Between January 2016 and August 2016, a continuous quality improvement project prospectively collected data on 51 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at 10mmHg. Cholecystectomy was performed either with a conventional C02 insufflator (CI) or an insufflation management system (IMS). Bivariate statistical analysis was used to compare preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data with p-values <0.05 considered significant.

Results: Of the 51 patients, 25 underwent cholecystectomy with IMS and 26 CI. No significant difference in preoperative demographics, acuity of operation, body mass index or laboratory values were demonstrated. Mean intraoperative pressure was 10.6±1.6 mmHg for IMS versus 11.1±1.8 mmHg for CI (p=NS). Insufflation pressure was increased in 32% of IMS vs. 44% of CI patients (p=NS). No significant difference in etC02 (35.2 vs. 35.2), mean airway pressure (10.1 vs. 9.6), intraoperative complications (4% vs. 1%) or operative time (50 vs. 42 minutes) was demonstrated between IMS and CI, respectively. Postoperatively, PACU total morphine equivalents given was significantly decreased in IMS as compared to the CI group (21.8 vs. 41.4, p=0.04) as was length of stay based on incision start time (19.6 vs. 30 hours, p=0.03). No difference in PACU VAS pain scores was demonstrated. No differences in pain or complications were demonstrated at 30-days.

Conclusions: Operating at lower intra-abdominal pressures is safe, feasible and may be associated with a more favorable ventilatory profile as compared to averages cited in the literature. While not significant, a trend in maintenance and stability of lower pressure was demonstrated with utilization of IMS. Despite similar VAS scores, PACU length of stay and morphine requirements were significantly reduced in IMS patients. This finding suggests a recovery benefit to patients who underwent surgery with IMS; however, more studies are needed to corroborate this finding.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 80062

Program Number: P113

Presentation Session: Poster (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search