• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Predicting Continued Or Recurrent Symptoms Following Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair

Predicting Continued Or Recurrent Symptoms Following Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair

E L Albright, MD, M Plymale, MSN RN, D L Davenport, PhD, J S Roth, MD. University of Kentucky

Introduction: Recurrent complaints of abdominal pain, bloating and dysphagia are problematic in the post-operative period following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and often lead to radiologic evaluation or intervention. While the majority of patients do well, recurrence of symptoms or other complaints in the postoperative period can be challenging. The purpose of this study is to determine if patient or operative variables can be used to predict the need for radiologic evaluation, re-admission, endoscopy or re-operation following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias was conducted from December 2008-June 2010 at a single institution. Data collected included patient factors (age, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, acute vs. chronic presentation and any prior repairs) and operative factors (use of gastrostomy tube, length of operation, use of mesh, bougie size). Patients with re-admission, postoperative diagnostic imaging, endoscopic intervention or re-operation were classified as having recurrent symptoms and compared to patients without recurrent symptoms. Univariate analysis between groups was performed using t-tests for continuous variables and fisher’s exact test for dichotomous variables using SPSS v.18 software.

Results: 43 patients were identified that underwent paraesophageal hernia repair during the study period. Of these patients 10 (23.3%) underwent diagnostic re-imaging, 3 (7%) required re-admission, 3 (7%) underwent interventions and 1 (2.3%) required re-operation, resulting in a total of 12 patients (28%) classified as having recurrent symptoms. There was no difference in age, BMI, co-morbidities, or presentation between groups; although a trend was observed in cardiac disease and use of G-tube (p < 0.1). Length of procedure was significantly longer in the recurrent symptoms group (p<0.05).

Recurrent Symptoms No Recurrent Symptoms p
No of Cases 12 31
Ages (years)* 66.00 ± 12.33 59.94 ± 13.33 0.179
BMI > 30 5 14 1.000
Gender (M:F) 2:10 7:24 1.000
Presence of Co-Morbidities
Diabetes Mellitus 2 2 0.308
Cardiac Disease 11 19 0.070
Pulmonary Disease 1 7 0.407
History of Smoking 3 3 0.325
Depression/Anxiety 2 11 0.290
ASA > 2 10 19 0.279
Acute Presentation 3 4 0.378
Recurrent 2 4 1.000
Length of Procedure (minutes)* 227.33 ± 83.97 178.42 ± 47.91 0.021
Use of G-tube 9 13 0.088

* These data are represented by mean ± standard deviation.

Conclusions: The majority of patients did not experience recurrent symptoms following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Small sample size limits the conclusions that can be drawn. Length of procedure appears to be predictive of which patients will present with symptoms requiring further investigation or intervention. This most likely is a marker for operative complexity. Cardiac disease and use of G-tube trended towards significance. Additional research is needed to determine possible etiologies and improve the outcome of this subset of patients.


Session: Poster
Program Number: P294
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals