• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in the Elderly Patient

Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in the Elderly Patient

Isabelle Raiche, MD FRCSC, Fatima Haggar, MPH, Joseph Mamazza, MDCM FRCSC, Husein Moloo, MD FRCSC MSc, Guillaume Martel, MD FRCSC, Eric C Poulin, MD MSc FRCS C, James Masters, MD, Christopher Smith, MD FRCSC, Balpreet Brar, MD FRCSC. The Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Group, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa

 

Background: The elderly population often presents an increased surgical risk. The potential risk of surgical complications is always balanced against the risk of the primary disease. Paraesophageal hernias in the elderly present a unique challenge to the clinicians. The aim of this study was to 1) compare the short-term postoperative outcomes between the different surgical approaches (laparoscopy, laparotomy and thoracotomy) for paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair in elderly patients; and 2) evaluate the short-term postoperative outcomes following emergency and elective PEH procedures in elderly patients.

Methods: Data was obtained on patients 70 years of age or older who underwent PEH repair from a prospective database. This database included patients who underwent surgical hernia repair by laparoscopy, laparotomy or thoracotomy between July 2005 and December 2010 at a single academic center. The surgical approach was left to the surgeon discretion. Length of stay (LOS), postoperative morbidity and mortality were analysed.

Results: Ninety-five patients (27 males, 68 females) with a median age of 77 years (interquartile range, IQR: 9 years) undergoing laparoscopy (n=52, 54.7%), laparotomy (n=30, 31.6%) and thoracotomy (n=13, 13.7%) were included. In the thoracotomy group, 8 patients had a Collis gastroplasty. A majority of included patients had ASA score of II (31.6%), III (46.3%) or IV (14.7%). The most frequent diagnosis was type III PEH (n=72, 75.8%), 17 patients had type IV (17.9%) and 6 patients had type II (6.3%).
 

         In the patients undergoing elective surgery (n=71, 74.7%), the median LOS was 6.0 days (IQR: 5 days). For this group, the median LOS for patients undergoing laparoscopy was 4.8 days, which was significantly shorter than for patients undergoing laparotomy (9.2 days, p=0.02) and thoracotomy (14.2 days, p=<0.0001). The post-operative complication rate for the laparoscopy group was 34.0% (n=16), 57.1% for the laparotomy group (n=8) and 70.0%for the thoracotomy group (n=7); the difference was statistically significant only between the thoracotomy group and the laparoscopy group (p=0.02). The overall mortality rate was 2.8% (n=2) without significant difference between the approach.
 

         Twenty-five percent of the cases (n=24) were emergencies, 19 patients for type III PEH (79.2%) and 5 patients for type IV (20.8%). The most frequent procedure performed was a laparotomy, crural repair and tube gastrostomy (n=16, 66.7%). Three patients had a fundoplication (12.5%). Only one patient needed a gastrectomy. Patients undergoing emergency procedures on average stayed in hospital significantly longer than patients undergoing elective procedures (6.3 vs. 44.1 days, p=0.02). Elderly patients undergoing emergency PEH surgery experienced 3 times higher odds of postoperative complications (odds ratio (OR) 3.13, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.16, 8.47 , p= 0.025) and nine (9) times higher odds of death (OR 9,09, 95% CI;1.63, 50 p=0.012) compared with those undergoing an elective procedure.

Conclusions: Despite underlying comorbidities, individuals older than 70 years of age tolerate elective laparoscopic PEH surgery relatively well. Emergency procedures for PEH are associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events or fatality. Referring practitioners need to be informed of the potential risk and encouraged to refer patients earlier.
 


Session Number: Poster – Poster Presentations
Program Number: P248
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search