• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
SAGES

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Outcome of Laparoscopic Colonic Resection for Submucosal Colorectal Carcinoma Not Suitable for Endoscopic Resection

Outcome of Laparoscopic Colonic Resection for Submucosal Colorectal Carcinoma Not Suitable for Endoscopic Resection

Introduction: Endoscopic resection (ER) that may be malignant deep invasion may not be suitable for ER. The submucosal colorectal carcinoma (CRC) may be needed additional treatment such as laparoscopic colonic resection (LAC), when tumors are failed to remove endoscopically. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of submucosal CRC (pT1 tumor) that were managed either endoscopically or laparoscopically. Method: Patients with submucosal CRC referred for ER followed by laparoscopic resection (ER/LAC group) or laparoscopic resection only (LAC group) were identified from colonic endoscopy database. Results: Seventy-nine patients were identified. The ER/LAC group was undergone for 30 patients with a mean age of 66 years, male/female ratio 2:1, and mean tumor size of 19 mm in diameter. The reasons for utilization of LAC were as follows; submucosal deep invasion (33%), lymphatic and/or vascular invasion (27%), and incomplete ER (47%). According to the postoperative pathological report, there were 23% of cancer involvement of the resection margin, and 3% of pN1 positive. One patient was identified liver metastasis and underwent partial liver resection during 966days of mean postoperative observation period (POP). The LAC group was 49 patients with mean age of 49 years, male/female ratio 1.3:1, and mean tumor size of 20 mm in diameter. The reasons to perform LAC only were as follows; more than 2 cm in diameter (43%), the prediction of deep submucosal invasion (31%), anatomical difficulties (12%), and patient proposal (14%). According to the pathological report, there was 24% of pTis, 59% of pT1, 12% of pT2, 4% of adenoma. Lymphatic involvement was identified 10% including 3 cases of pT1 and 2 cases of pT2. One case was identified death by lung cancer during 403 days of mean POP. In this series, LAC was performed for 79 patients. Mean postoperative stay was 12 days. The complication rate was 13%, including anastomotic leakage (6%), wound infection and small bowel obstruction (5%), and pulmonary embolism and anastomotic stricture (1%). Conclusions: The ER such as polypectomy or endoscopic submucosal dissection offers to be performed for carcinoma with slight submucosal invasion. However, this prediction by endoscopy is difficult. In this study, there was 26% of patients earned privilege by LAC in the ER/LAC group, and 71% of patients earned privilege including 10% of lymph node metastases in the LAC group. Laparoscopic procedure is now widely accepted with low complication rate and short hospital stay. Our indication for pT1 tumor is feasible to perform either endoscopically or laparoscopically.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P123

View Poster

74


Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

sagesweb@sages.org

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals