• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Operative Outcomes of Elective Giant Para-esophageal Hernia Repair at High Volume Centers – A Systematic Revie

Rafik Sorial, Sofia Valanci, Pepa Kaneva, Julio F. Fiore Jr, Gerald M Fried, Liane S Feldman, Lorenzo E Ferri, Lawrence Lee, Carmen L Mueller. McGill University

Introduction: Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (LPEHR) has historically been associated with significant morbidity and mortality, such that elective repair is only recommended for symptomatic patients. Since LPEHR was initially reported in the 1990s, technological improvements, specialization in surgical training and regionalization of care have occurred such that recent reports suggest modern era outcomes of LPEHR have improved. Elective repair may now be safer than previously thought, yet historical data continue to inform patient selection for surgery and informed consent discussions.

The objective of this study is to systematically review  modern era surgical outcomes for elective laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) performed at high volume center.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify all studies published between 01/2013-08/2018 reporting outcomes after elective repair of giant (>50% herniated stomach) paraesophageal hernia. High volume centers were defined as those reporting >15 cases/year over the study period. Review articles, those including >10% Type I PEH or revision surgeries, any co-surgeries other than cholecystectomy, pediatric series and those not reporting primary data were excluded. The MINORS instrument was used to assess quality of observational studies. Data heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.

Results: Eleven identified articles were included, of which ten were observational studies and one was an RCT. The mean MINORS score for observational studies was 14.0 (SD: 3.6; range: 9-18). A total of 1,926 patients underwent primary repair of type II-IV PEHs (63-78% female; mean age range 57-71 years). PEHs were classified by type in 8 studies (1146 patients) and were mostly Type IIIs (mean incidence MI=88%).  Procedures were begun laparoscopically in all studies except one (61% open approach) with conversion to open reported in 7/1707 cases (MI=0.2%). Collis gastroplasty was reported in 5 studies (MI=2.7%) and crural mesh reinforcement in 8 studies (MI=64%). Median length of stay ranged from 2-4 days. Complications within 30 days of surgery were reported in 10 studies (MI=11%), with 30/1809 cases severe (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3; MI=2.5%). Peri-operative death was reported in 1 case (MI=0.1%). Nine studies reported anatomical recurrences (MI=21%) of which revision was performed in 30 cases (MI=4.4%). Post-operative quality of life scores were reported in 6 (54.5%) studies, with all reporting statistically significant improvement over pre-operative values.

Conclusion: Modern-era morbidity and mortality after elective primary LPEHR in high volume centers is low. Patient selection for surgery and pre-operative consent discussions should reflect modern and institutional-specific outcomes data.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95425

Program Number: P557

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

41

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2019 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons