• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Open versus Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Is There a Superior Approach?

Open versus Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Is There a Superior Approach?

Kristin McCoy, MD, William Symons, MD, James Clarke, MD, Marissa Novack, MD, Meaghan Broderick, MD. Stamford Hospital

The inguinal hernia repair has seen several critical improvements in recent times due to the implementation of new techniques, including laparoscopic repair, as well as robotic repair. With over 600,000 inguinal hernia repairs performed annually, it is important to identify the safest and most patient-friendly method. For surgeons, robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery is gaining in popularity for its dexterity and 3D visualization. But despite the growing interest in robotic hernia repairs, there is a scarcity of literature to support its superiority over open inguinal hernia repair. This study hypothesizes that patients who undergo robot assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will have decreased immediate post-operative pain, shorter recovery room stays, decreased narcotic requirement, and overall decreased pain at follow up compared to open inguinal hernia repair.

In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent either an open or robotic assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair at Stamford Hospital, from July 2015-July 2017. The following characteristics were analyzed for both subsets of patients: gender, BMI, type of repair, operative time, recovery room time, immediate post-operative pain, and post-operative pain at follow up. Our study demonstrated longer average operative time for patients undergoing robotic hernia repair compared to open repair, which was statistically significant (p value = <0.05). Patients who underwent robotic inguinal hernia repair spent less time in the recovery room compared to patient who underwent open repair. In addition, patients in the robotic hernia group required less narcotics in the recovery room compared to patients who underwent open repair (p value = <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between lengths of hospital stay between the two groups. 

This study highlights several possible advantages of robotic inguinal hernia repair, including lower post-operative pain scores, less narcotic usage required in the post-operative period, as well as shorter recovery room time.  The results from this study should increase interest in investigating the superiority of robotic inguinal hernia repair. Future plans for study involve comparing robotic to laparoscopic repair. In addition, we plan to continue to follow the study patients to look at additional qualitative metrics, including time to return to work and time to return to daily activities.

 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 86169

Program Number: P785

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search