• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Modification of Child Pugh Score Improves Prognostication in Variceal Bleeding

Modification of Child Pugh Score Improves Prognostication in Variceal Bleeding

Richard T Spence1, Jake Krige2, Marius Hoogerboord1, James Ellsmere1. 1Dalhousie University, 2University of Cape Town

Background: There is currently no consensus which specific risk factors or scores predict early rebleeding and early mortality after a major variceal bleed.  The objective of this study was to investigate the relative predictive performances of the Child-Pugh and MELD scores for failure to control bleeding and death in alcoholic cirrhotic patients.

Methods: Prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with endoscopically proven acute esophageal variceal bleeding secondary to decompensated alcoholic liver cirrhosis presenting to a specialist surgical gastroenterology unit in South Africa between January 2000 and December 2017. All patients underwent urgent therapeutic upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy as soon as safely possible after admission and resuscitation, which included injection sclerotherapy (IST) and variceal band ligation (VBL). Data for Child-Pugh and MELD scores were prospectively collected. Receiving-operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the discriminative capacity of the scores, including a proposed modified Child Pugh classification (A-D), in predicting the risk of (i) rebleeding, and (ii) in-hospital death.

Results: During the 288 month study period, 403 consecutive adult patients were treated for bleeding esophageal varices in our unit of which 225 (175 men, 51 women) were secondary to alcoholic cirrhosis. The cohort had a median age of 50 years (IQR 27-87) and underwent 261 endoscopic variceal emergency treatments. Twenty-four (10.6%) patients were Child-Pugh grade A, 88 (39.1%) were grade B and 113 (50.2%) were grade C when assessed on their first admission to hospital. MELD scores ranged from 3 to 40. Thirty one patients experienced a rebleed (13.8%) and 42 patients died (18.7%).There was no difference in the discriminatory capacity of the Child Pugh (ROC 0.59 95%CI 0.50-0.67) and MELD (ROC 0.62 95% CI 0.51-0.73) to predict rebleeding (p=0.72), or between the Child Pugh (ROC 0.75 95%CI 0.71-0.81) and MELD (ROC 0.71 95% 0.62-0.80) to predict death (p=0.35). A proposed modified Child Pugh classification (A-D) had significantly improved discriminatory capacity (ROC 0.83 95% 0.77-0.89) compared to the original Child Pugh score (A-C) and MELD to predict death (p=0.004), Figure 1.

Conclusion: A proposed modified four category Child Pugh classification outperforms the original Child Pugh and MELD scores to predict death in bleeding esophageal varices in alcoholic cirrhotics. Contemporary scoring systems have poor ability to identify patients at high risk of early rebleeding.

 

Figure 1:Discriminatory performance of scores to predict mortality in bleeding varices


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 93756

Program Number: S092

Presentation Session: Flexible Endoscopy I

Presentation Type: Podium

257

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals