• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Military Experience in the Management of Pelvic Fractures from OIF/OEF

Military Experience in the Management of Pelvic Fractures from OIF/OEF

William J Parker, MD, Robert Despain, MD, Jeffrey Bailey, MD, Eric Elster, MD, Carlos Rodriguez, MD, MBA, Matthew Bradley, MD. Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Introduction: Pelvic fractures are a common occurrence in combat trauma. However, the fracture pattern and management within the most recent conflicts has yet to be described, especially in the context of dismounted complex blast injury. Our goal was to identify incidence, patterns of injury, and management of pelvic fractures.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review on all combat injured patients who arrived at our military treatment hospital between November 2010 and November 2012. Basic demographics, Young-Burgess fracture pattern classification, and treatment strategies were examined.

Results: Of 562 patients identified within the study time period, 14% (81/562) were found to have a pelvic fracture. The vast majority (85%) were secondary to an improvised explosive device.  The average injury severity score for patients with pelvic fracture was 31 +/-12 and 70% were classified as open.  Of the 228 patients with any traumatic lower extremity amputation, 22% had pelvic fractures; while 31% of patients with bilateral above-knee amputations also sustained a pelvic fracture. The most common Young-Burgess injury pattern was anterior-posterior compression (APC) (57%), followed by lateral compression (LC) (36%) and vertical sheer (VS) (7%).  Only 2% of all patients (9/562) were recorded as having pelvic binders placed in the pre-hospital setting.  49% of patients with pelvic fracture required procedural therapy, the most common of which was placement of a pelvic external fixator (34/40; 85%), followed by pre-peritoneal packing (16/40; 40%), and angio-embolization (3/40; 0.75%). 17 patients (42.5%) required combinations of these three treatment modalities, the majority of which were a combination of external fixator and pre-peritoneal packing.  Likelihood to need procedural therapy was impacted by injury pattern as 72% of patients with an APC injury, 100% of patients with a VS injury, and 25% of patients with a LC injury required procedural therapy. 

Conclusions: Pelvic fractures were common concomitant injuries following blast-induced traumatic lower extremity amputations.  APC was the most common pelvic fracture pattern identified. While procedural therapy was frequent, the majority of patients underwent conservative therapy. However, placement of an external fixator was the most frequently used modality.  Considering angioembolization was used in less than 1% of cases, in the forward deployed military environment, management should focus on pelvic external fixation +/- pre-peritoneal packing.  Finally, pre-hospital pelvic binder application may be an area for further process improvement.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 94726

Program Number: MSS09

Presentation Session: Full-Day Military Surgical Symposium – Trauma/Critical Care Presentations

Presentation Type: MSSPodium

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search