• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Measure twice, cut once: anatomy-based sleeve gastrectomy associated with dramatic benefits versus suction bougie in sleeve gastrectomy pouch creation

Measure twice, cut once: anatomy-based sleeve gastrectomy associated with dramatic benefits versus suction bougie in sleeve gastrectomy pouch creation

Jonathan R Thompson, MD1, Vikrom K Dhar, MD1, Dennis J Hanseman, PhD2, Brad M Watkins, MD1, Tayyab S Diwan, MD1, Thomas Inge, MD, PhD3, John M Morton, MD, MPH4. 1University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 2SET Data Collaborative, 3Children’s Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado, Denver, 4Stanford School of Medicine

Introduction: Anatomic imperfections in the sleeve gastrectomy pouch have been implicated in increased gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and food intolerance following LSG. Anatomy-based sleeve gastrectomy (ABS) has been developed to improve the shape, volume and anatomic consistency of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) pouch. We report our one-year results using an ABS technique.

Methods: A quality improvement data collaborative was initiated with custom fields added to the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database. Determination of “not human subjects research” was obtained from our IRB. ABS was implemented beginning in 6/2016. ABS consists of planning a sleeve gastrectomy pouch by marking the stomach 1cm from the gastroesophageal junction, 3cm from the IA, and 6cm from the pylorus. The marks are lined up beside a 25cm clamp and a 60mm endocutter is used to resect the stomach. 641 ABS cases were compared to 737 cases where a 40F suction bougie was used for pouch creation (1/2014-5/2016). No programmatic changes were made during this time. 30-day safety, 6-month and 1-year GERD and weight loss outcomes were compared. Students t test and Chi square tests were used as appropriate. 

Results: No significant differences in gender, preoperative BMI, or operative time were identified between groups (all p > 0.05). Average age was 45 in the bougie group and 43.5 in ABS (p = 0.02). ABS was associated with shorter length of stay (1.2 vs 1.7, p <0.01), 42% fewer readmissions (3.3% vs 5.7%, p = 0.03), 61% fewer readmissions due to nausea/vomiting (1.1% vs 2.9%, p = 0.02). ABS patients had a 48% lower 6-month GERD rate (21% vs 40%, p < 0.01), 86% higher 6-month GERD resolution rate (54% vs 29%, p <0.01), 49% lower 1-year GERD rate (20% vs 39%, p < 0.01), 106% higher 1-year GERD resolution rate (72% vs 35%, p < 0.01). Both groups had similar 1-year % total weight loss (26.3% vs 27.3%, p = 0.41).

Conclusion: Anatomy-based sleeve gastrectomy offers benefits over sleeve gastrectomy with suction bougie with regard to 30-day safety and dramatic improvement of GERD rates at 6 months and 1 year.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 93516

Program Number: P119

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search