• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer With the High Ligation Using Automatic Stapling Device: the Examination of Oncologic Validity and Technically Safety

Masanori Naito, PhD MD, Masahiko Watanabe, PhD MD, Takeo Sato, PhD MD, Atsushi Ikeda, PhD MD, Naoto Ogura, MD. Kitasato University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery

 

Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is excellent in cosmetic and minimally invasive procedure, but is the need for skillful technique. We performed laparoscopic colorectal surgery with the high ligation using automatic stapling device for the purpose of being technically easily. Here we examined oncologic validity and technically safety of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with the high ligation using automatic stapling device.
Methods: There were 104 patients (median age, 68 years, range 43-88) who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for cecum cancer, ascending colon cancer, sigmoid colon cancer and recto-sigmoid colon cancer from January 2006 to December 2010. Furthermore, there were 35 patients ( median age, 66 years, range 29-84) who were performed laparoscopic rectectomy for rectal cancer at the same time. We examined operation times, the amount of bleeding and complications between the high ligation technique using automatic stapling device (instrument technique) and conventional technique by the high ligation using clip or ligature (conventional technique).
Results: As for colon cancer, the procedure was underwent the instrument technique to 68 patients and the conventional technique to 36 patients. In the instrument technique, the median number of dissected lymph nodes was 13 (range 0-40). The median operation time and the median amount of bleeding were 155 minutes (range 93-280) and 35 ml (range 5-510) in right side colectomy, and 210 minutes (range 105-340) and 10 ml (range 5-70) in left side colectomy, respectively. In the conventional technique, the median number of dissected lymph nodes was 13 (range 0-58). The median operation time and the median amount of bleeding were 170 minutes (range 95-270) and 5 ml (range 5-80) in right side colectomy, and 197 minutes (range 136-360) and 20 ml (range 5-245) in left side colectomy, respectively. Post-operative complications occurred in 13 patients (16.2%) of the instrument technique and 7 patients (19.4%) of the conventional technique. Whereas as for rectal cancer, the procedure was underwent the instrument technique to 27 patients and the conventional technique to 8 patients. The median number of dissected lymph nodes was 8 (range 2-22) in the instrument technique and 5 (range 2-17) in the conventional technique. In the instrument technique, the median operation time and the median amount of bleeding were 267 minutes (range 170-342) and 40 ml (range 5-110), respectively. In the conventional technique, the median operation time and the median amount of bleeding were 261.5 minutes (range 220-334) and 32.5 ml (range 5-120), respectively.
Conclusions: In this examination, we have shown that laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with the high ligation using automatic stapling device is oncologic validity and technically safety.
 


Session Number: Poster – Poster Presentations
Program Number: P075
View Poster

41

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2012 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons