• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY IS AN INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR FOR POOR FOLLOW-UP AND WEIGHT LOSS AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY

LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY IS AN INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR FOR POOR FOLLOW-UP AND WEIGHT LOSS AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY

Anahita D Jalilvand, MD, Alecia Blaszczak, BS, Andrew Detty, BA, Jane Dewire, Bradley J Needleman, MD, Sabrena F Noria, MD, PhD. The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center

INTRODUCTION: Follow up after bariatric surgery (BS) is known to be an important predictor of post-operative weight loss. The primary goal of this study was to determine predictors of poor follow-up and weight loss outcomes in a single, large-volume academic bariatric center. 

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) between 2014-2016, by two experienced bariatric surgeons. Baseline demographic, psychosocial, and medical data were obtained on all patients. Patients who did not present to the bariatric clinic at scheduled post-operative visits were categorized as “no-shows”. Poor weight loss was defined as the lowest quartile (<25th) of % excess body weight loss (%EBWL-25th) at each time point. Independent predictors of %EBWL-25th and follow-up at 6, 12, 24, an 36 months were determined using multiple logistic regressions (MLR), and a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. 

RESULTS: Of the 570 patients reviewed, the no-show rates at 6,12, and 24 months after BS were 20.2% (n=115), 34.1% (n=194), and 55.8% (n=318). The no-show rate for eligible patients at 3 years was 69.3% (n=214). Undergoing LSG was an independent predictor of no-shows at 6, 12, and 24 months post BS. However, the only predictor of no-shows at 3 years was younger age (OR 1.02, p=0.04). Independent predictors of %EBWL-25th at 6-months included higher baseline BMI (OR 1.1, p<0.005), insulin-dependent diabetes (OR 3.7, p=0.005), LSG (OR 4.0, p<0.0005), and African American (AA) race (1.7, p=0.003). At 12-months, higher preoperative BMI (OR 1.1, p<0.005) and LSG (OR 6.2, p<0.005) remained significant, but patients with less than a highschool education also predicted %EBWL-25th. At 24 months, while LSG and high baseline BMI remained significant predictors of %EBWL-25th, so too did AA race (OR 3.07, p=0.03), baseline depression (OR 2.9, p=0.009), and no-shows at 6-months (OR 4.75, p=0.04).  At 36-months, significant predictors of %EBWL-25th included LSG (OR 29.1, p=0.001) and higher binge eating scores (OR 7.3, p=0.02). Patients in the %EBWL-25th at 36 months had significantly higher no-show rates at 6-months (100% vs 43.9%, p=0.002) and 12-months (90.9% vs 43.6%, p=0.006). 

CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients undergoing LSG are more likely to have poor follow-up and weight-loss in both the short and long-term after BS. Given the increasing demand for LSG, further studies are needed to determine whether the etiology is related to the surgical procedure itself, and/or characteristics of patients who choose to undergo LSG.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95660

Program Number: S116

Presentation Session: Bariatric III – Optimizing Care and Pathways

Presentation Type: Podium

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search