• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Laparoscopic Revision of Esophagomyotomy

Laparoscopic Revision of Esophagomyotomy

Michael Edye, MD FACS, Ramin Roohipour, MD, Leon Kushnir, MD, Barry Jaffin, MD. Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.

Esophagomyotomy remains the most effective long-term solution for achalasia and results in symptomatic relief in more than 90% of patients. Failure rates have been quoted as high as 17% necessitating further endoscopic interventions such as pneumatic dilatation, re-operation, and even esophagectomy in severe cases. Revisional surgery after a failed Heller myotomy is technically demanding. This video demonstrates the preoperative work-up, intra-operative decision-making and complex operative techniques necessary to identify and correct this challenging problem.The patient was a 53 year old man who underwent an esophagomyotomy with a Dor fundoplication several months after the diagnosis of achalasia in 2008. Despite apparently adequate surgical technique as evidenced by a review of the operative report, the patient experienced rapid recurrence of symptoms including chest pain, dysphagia, and frequent regurgitation. Preoperative manometry showed an aperistaltic esophagus and a barium esophagram showed a classic ‘bird beak’ EG junction with delayed barium passage. Upper endoscopy confirmed esophageal dilatation with an anterior out-pouching present above the high pressure zone. During laparoscopic hiatal dissection air insuflation from intraoperative endoscopy revealed an area of ballooning esophageal submucosa below the diaphragm proximal to the EG junction. A narrowing with bands of raised scar tissue and muscle fibers was noted just distal to the ballooning mucosa, suggesting the site of an incomplete myotomy. To minimize bleeding, this area was divided with careful application of a reversed a Harmonic scalpel, and extended 2 centimeters onto the fundus. Re-insuflation with an endoscope revealed increased mural laxity. To maximize EG junction relaxation, a posterior myotomy was performed directly opposite the anterior revision. An anterior fundoplication was fashioned to bolster the exposed submucosa and to counter reflux. Post-operative esophagram showed prompt passage of contrast into the stomach and the patient has since reported significant and sustained improvement in swallowing and resolution of regurgitation. Failed primary esophagomyotomy poses a significant diagnostic challenge requiring careful workup. Reoperation is technically demanding necessitating critical decision making and a multi-modality approach. Anticipation of the altered anatomy due to postoperative changes and likely etiology is of paramount importance in a revision operation. Use of energy sources in contact with delicate tissues should be avoided to prevent thermal injury and perforation. Intra-operative endoscopy plays a vital role to highlight landmarks, confirm completeness of myotomy and check for leaks. Both surgeon and patient need to have realistic expectations of the possible outcomes.


Session: SS03
Program Number: V004

208

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals