• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Laparoscopic Proctectomy for Lower Rectal Cancer

Laparoscopic Proctectomy for Lower Rectal Cancer

Purpose: Laparoscopic proctectomy is still controversial, especially for lower rectal cancer. This study assessed laparoscopic proctectomy for extraperitoneal rectal cancer.
Patients: Thirty four consecutive laparoscopic proctectomy for extraperitoneal rectal cancer were enrolled since 2002 to 2008. Mean age was 64.4 year-old, they were 21 males and 13 females. Procedures were; low anterior resection (LAR) with stapling anastomosis: 20, intersphincteric resection (ISR): 13, Hartmann: 1. Lymph node dissection was; D3 (from origin of the IMA): 12, D2 (from LCA): 22. Preoperative diagnosis was; T1: 22, T2: 9, T3: 3. There were no case with preoperative radiation therapy. Diverting stoma was made in 11/13 of ISR and in 8/20 of LAR.
Technique: Regarding very low anterior resection and ISR, intersphinteric space was opened by laparoscopic approach. Generally anorectal ring is well-confirmed and dissected easily. This technique is very useful for ISR to diminish the anal work near cancer. Also for very low anterior resection, linear stapling is easier after intersphincteric mobilization.
Results: Mean operating time was 327 minutes. According to procedures, operating time of LAR was 316 min. and that of ISR was 354 min. Mean blood loss was 119g in overall, 104g in LAR and 143g in ISR. No patients needed blood transfusion. Median postoperative hospital stay was 10 days in overall, 9 days in LAR and 11 days in ISR. There were two leakages in LAR (10%).and no leakage in ISR. Postoperative ileus was seen in each one case of both LAR and ISR. Urinary dysfunction with transient self-catheterization was also seen in one case each. There was no mortality. One local recurrence was detected in T3 patients.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic proctectomy for lower rectal cancer is feasible and safe in T1 and T2 patients.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P172

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search