• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Is there any difference in long-term cancer recurrence between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in mid/low rectal cancer?

Is there any difference in long-term cancer recurrence between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in mid/low rectal cancer?

Soo Yeun Park, Jun Seok Park, Hye Jin Kim, Sung-Min Lee, Gyu-Seog Choi. Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital

Background: Robotic surgery has been suggested as an option for total mesorectal excision, with the expectation of the improvement in the clinical outcomes. The long-term oncologic impact of robotic rectal cancer surgery has not been clearly delineated.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic total mesorectal excision for mid/low rectal cancer, in comparison with the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery.

Method: This is a retrospective study at a single tertiary university hospital. An institutional database was researched for all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery for stage I–III mid/low rectal cancer between January 2009 and December 2013. Patients who underwent intersphincteric resection or lateral pelvic lymph node dissection were excluded. There were a total of 533 patients, of whom 415 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and 118 patients underwent robotic surgery. Propensity score analyses were performed to compare oncologic outcomes for each group in a 1:1 case-matched cohort. The main outcomes were 5-year disease-free, 5-year pelvic-recurrence, and 5-year distant recurrence rate.

Results: 118 patients were included in each group, and the two groups were well balanced in terms of basic characteristics, perioperative treatment, and pathologic stage. Conversion to open surgery was observed in one case in the laparoscopic group. The circumferential resection margin was positive (less than 1 mm) in one case in the robotic group. The 5-year disease- free survival rate was 87.5%% in the laparoscopic group, and 86.6% in the robotic group (p = 0.772). The 5-year pelvic recurrence rate was 6.2% and 5.6%, respectively (p = 0.720). The 5-year distant recurrence rate was 10.4% and 10.0%, respectively (p = 0.942). The location of the pelvic recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative chemoradiation, pT3-4 tumors, and pN2 were independently related to disease-free survival. In patients who had preoperative chemoradiation and pT3-4 tumors, the 5-year disease-free survival rate and 5-year distant recurrence rate were 58.3% and 41.7% in the laparoscopic group and 81.3% and 9.8% in the robotic group (p = 0.136 and p = 0.029, respectively).

Conclusion: Robotic surgery for mid/low rectal cancer showed similar long-term oncologic outcomes with laparoscopic surgery. It is warrant to prove whether patients with risk factors of disease recurrence can be considered as an appropriate candidate for robotic surgery in the future.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95008

Program Number: S131

Presentation Session: Colorectal III

Presentation Type: Podium

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search