• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / In Vivo Assessment of an Absorbable and Non-Absorbable Knotless Barbed Suture for Laparoscopic Single-Layer Enterotomy Closure: A Clinical and Biomechanical Comparison Against Non-Barbed Suture

In Vivo Assessment of an Absorbable and Non-Absorbable Knotless Barbed Suture for Laparoscopic Single-Layer Enterotomy Closure: A Clinical and Biomechanical Comparison Against Non-Barbed Suture

Philip Omotosho, MD, Basil Yurcisin, MD, Eugene Ceppa, MD, Jeffrey Miller, MS, David Kirsch, MS, Dana Portenier, MD. Duke University Medical Center

Background: Laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing and knot tying is a complex skill that requires repeated deliberate practice to master. A novel self-anchoring barbed suture material that does not require knot tying can eliminate knot failure and reduce operating time. The goal of this study was to compare the in vivo efficacy of two novel knotless barbed sutures (absorbable and non-absorbable) for use with the Endo Stitch™ device (Covidien, Mansfield, MA), against conventional suture (Endo Stitch™ device with Polysorb™ suture, Covidien, Mansfield, MA) for laparoscopic closure of viscerotomies in canine stomach, jejunum, and colon. Methods: Following IACUC approval twenty-four dogs underwent laparoscopic creation of 25 mm viscerotomies, three each in the stomach, jejunum, and colon. All viscerotomies were closed with the Endo Stitch™ device using the absorbable or non-absorbable barbed suture or conventional suture. Closure time for each viscerotomy was recorded. Animals were survived for 3, 10, or 21 days, at which point the viscerotomies were burst-pressure tested. Results: The closure leak rate in this study with 216 total viscerotomy closures was 0%. There was no statistically significant difference in mean burst pressure between viscerotomies closed with barbed suture versus control suture at any of the survival intervals. Barbed suture with the Endo Stitch™ device was associated with statistically significantly faster closure times than the control suture with the Endo Stitch™ device (P<0.05) resulting in a reduction in closure time between 35-42%. Conclusion: This study reports the first use of barbed suture for the Endo Stitch™ device in laparoscopic gastrointestinal closure. The barbed suture for the Endo Stitch™ device is effective for laparoscopic single-layer gastrointestinal closure and is associated with a significantly reduced closure time.

Time savings (absorbable barbed vs. control)
Tissue

Time savings (mean to mean, min: sec)

% Decrease
in Closure Time
Stomach 1:47 35%
Jejunum 1:49 35%
Colon 2:07 42%
Time savings (Non-absorbable barbed vs. control)
Tissue Time savings (mean to mean, min: sec) % Decrease
in Closure Time
Stomach 1:54 38%
Jejunum 2:02 38%
Colon 1:52 37%

Session: Poster
Program Number: P423
View Poster

204

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals