• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Impact of laparoscopic simultaneous hepatectomoy in treatment of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis

Impact of laparoscopic simultaneous hepatectomoy in treatment of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis

Takeaki Ishizawa, MD, PhD, FACS1, Shoji Kawakatsu2, Yoshiya Fujimoto2, Takafumi Sato2, Yoshihiro Ono2, Yoshihiro Mise2, Yosuke Inoue2, Hiromichi Ito2, Yu Takahashi2, Masashi Ueno2, Akio Saiura2. 1Cancer Institute Hospital / The University of Tokyo, 2Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research

Background: Although laparoscopic approach has been indicated widely in treatment of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis, safety and efficacy of laparoscopic simultaneous hepatectomy remains unclear.

Methods: Subject consisted of 258 patients who had undergone curative resection of colorectal cancer with simultaneous hepatectomy for synchronous liver metastasis. Surgical outcomes were compared between patients in the early period (2006-2012, n=117) and those in the latter period (2013-2017, n=141). In the latter period, short-term outcomes were also compared between the open hepatectomy group (OH; open or laparoscopic colorectal resection with open hepatectomy) and the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (LH; laparoscopic colorectal resection with laparoscopic hepatectomy). Laparoscopic hepatectomy has been indicated as a standard care since 2013, basically for liver metastasis resected by 4 or less wedge resections and/or left lateral sectionectomy.

Results: Indication of laparoscopic surgery had been extended over time; proportion of open hepatectomy and colorectal resection, open hepatectomy and laparoscopic colorectal resection, and laparoscopic hepatectomy and colorectal resection was 50%, 45%, and 5% in the early period and 21%, 53%, and 26% in the latter period, respectively. In the latter period, length of postoperative hospital was shorter than the early period (median [range], 15 [6-71] days vs. 17 [7-84)] days; P=0.041), while total operation time tended to be prolonged (519 [248-998] min vs. 425 [173-1116] min; P<0.001). In the latter period, surgical outcomes in the LH group (n=37) were more favorable than those in the OH group (n=104) in terms of total operation time (474 [311-905] min vs. 548 [248-998] min; P=0.025), estimated blood loss amount (200 [5-700] mL vs. 580 (0-1675) mL, P<0.001), postoperative hospital stay (13 [8-42] days vs. 15 [8-71] days; P=0.004), and R0 rate for liver metastasis (100% vs. 89%; P=0.008), although hepatic transection speed in the LH group was slower (0.61 [0.14-1.18] cm2/s vs. 1.36 [0.34-4.7] cm2/s). Morbidity and mortality were 5.4% and 0% in the LH group and 9.6% and 0% in the OH group, respectively.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic simultaneous hepatectomy with colorectal resection can be applied safely and may enhance patients’ postoperative recovery, if liver metastasis can be removed by simple wedge resections and/or left lateral sectionectomy. Further improvement in hepatic transection techniques is needed to extend indication of totally laparoscopic approach to colorectal cancer with synchronous metastasis requiring complicated hepatectomy.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 94339

Program Number: P650

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search