• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Hybrid Transumbilical Cholecystectomy with Needlescopic Fundal Retraction Safe for Acute and Chronic Cholecystitis

Hybrid Transumbilical Cholecystectomy with Needlescopic Fundal Retraction Safe for Acute and Chronic Cholecystitis

Jennifer J Freeman, MD, Alexander Feliz, MD, Shawn Tsuda, MD. University of Nevada School of Medicine

Background: Limited retraction has been an obstacle in the advancement of pure transumbilical cholecystectomy. Adequate retraction is essential in obtaining a critical view for safe cholecystectomy. As a result, several groups have investigated alternative methods for fundal retraction, including the use of additional needlescopic (2 mm) or 5 mm ports to assist in obtaining the critical view of safety. We reviewed the results of a single institution with respect to transumbilical cholecystectomy with a single subxyphoid 2 mm needlescopic instrument for retraction of the gallbladder fundus to aid in obtaining a critical view of safety.

Methods: Thirty-nine consecutive patients with a mean age of 35.6 years (range 17 to 56) were identified. A SILS port (Covidien, Mansfield, MA) was placed at the umbilicus accommodating a 5 mm 45 degree scope and two 5 mm straight dissection instruments. A (2 mm) needlescopic retractor (Stryker, San Jose, CA) was placed in the subxyphoid region directly through the abdominal wall for retraction of the gallbladder fundus in an anterior and cephalad direction. Infundibular retraction and tissue dissection were facilitated with the two transumbilical instruments. Patient characteristics and end-points examined included pathologic diagnosis, degree of leukocytosis, ASA class, operative time, length of stay, addition of secondary ports, conversions to four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, conversions to open cholecystectomy, and complications including return to operating room, readmissions, wound infection, abscess, bile leak, common bile duct injury, hernia, or need for further procedures.

Results: Patients all had a pathologic diagnosis of acute or chronic cholecystitis. White blood cell counts averaged 8.75 (range 3.3 to 20.5). ASA class averaged 1.85 (range 1 to 3). Operative times averaged 72.1 minutes (range 31 to 120 minutes). Hospital stays averaged 0.7 days (range 0 to 5 days). Four cases were converted to a traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In two cases, an additional 5 mm port was inserted along the right lateral subcostal margin to assist with infundibular traction. Complications included one patient requiring a postoperative ERCP for a retained gallstone, and one patient with an unplanned return to the operating suite on post operative day 2 for an unrelated small bowel obstruction secondary to a remote laparotomy.

Conclusion: Hybrid transumbilical cholecystectomy with a single subxyphoid needlescopic port is safe for acute and chronic cholecystitis. There were no instances of bile leak, soft tissue infection, abscess, hernia or bile duct injury. One patient with choledocholithiasis had a retained stone after surgery for which she underwent an ERCP without further complication. One patient was returned to the OR for refractory abdominal pain due to an unrelated small bowel obstruction. Operative times and incidence of complications for transumbilical cholecystectomy with needlescopic retraction of the fundus are within acceptable range and safe for both acute and chronic gallbladder disease.


Session: Poster
Program Number: P376
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals