• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / GANGRENOUS CHOLECYSTITIS: DELAYS IN SURGICAL EVALUATION AND OUTCOMES IN THE ERA OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY

GANGRENOUS CHOLECYSTITIS: DELAYS IN SURGICAL EVALUATION AND OUTCOMES IN THE ERA OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY

Rebecca C Gologorsky, MD1, Justin Tse, MD2, Dylan Wolman, MD2, Aya Kamaya, MD2. 1University of California San Francisco-East Bay, 2Stanford University

Introduction: Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is a highly morbid complication of acute cholecystitis (AC). Risk factors for gangrenous progression are poorly described, as are pre-operative clinical features and post-operative outcomes in the era of minimally invasive surgery.

Methods and Procedures: Patients who underwent cholecystectomy for AC from January 2014-May 2018 at a single academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed, with pathologic confirmation of GC vs. uncomplicated acute cholecystitis (UAC) in all included patients.

Pertinent clinical features, demographics, and laboratory values were recorded. Two-tailed t-tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used to determine statistical significance for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

Results: Among the 101 patients reviewed, 48 (48%) had GC and 53 (52%) had UAC. Patients with GC were older (62±17 vs. 48±18; p=0.0001) and predominantly male (65% vs 38%; p=0.005). Delays in diagnosis or treatment were significantly more common among patients with GC (46% vs 17%, p=0.0025), defined as a failure to recognize or treat acute cholecystitis at initial emergency department or urgent care visit up to 14 days prior to surgical admission (Table 1). Among patients with delayed care, none were surgically evaluated until subsequent admission. Mean time from imaging to surgical consult did not differ between groups (4.3h vs. 4.6h, p=0.9167). Following surgical consultation, there was no difference in mean time to surgery (24.6h vs. 21.0h, p=0.4128). Among patients with GC, 17 (35%) underwent open cholecystectomy, of which 13 (27%) were converted from a laparoscopic approach. Among patients with UAC, only 2 (3.7%; p=0.0001) underwent open cholecystectomy, both converted from a laparoscopic approach. Postoperatively, 5 (10%) patients with GC were admitted to the ICU versus 1 (2%) UAC patient (p=0.0994), and total length of hospitalization was greater among GC patients (5.0d vs. 2.7d; p=0.0022). Complication rates were higher among GC patients (17% vs. 3.8%; p=0.0441), with greater complication severity, including one death (2%).

Conclusion: GC is a clinically under-recognized surgical urgency. Delays in diagnosis of AC and subsequent surgical consultation contribute to its prevalence. A need for improved diagnostic recognition of AC is necessary to reduce risk of progression to GC, and to rapidly treat GC on presentation.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 93057

Program Number: P202

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search