• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Evaluation of intraperitoneal tissue attachments to biologically derived surgical meshes in a rabbit model

Evaluation of intraperitoneal tissue attachments to biologically derived surgical meshes in a rabbit model

Hannah B Baker, PhD, Adam Young, PhD, Thomas Gilbert, PhD. ACell Inc.

The utility of biologically derived surgical meshes relies on their capacity to integrate with host tissue and remodel over time. However, development of mesh attachment to viscera after intraperitoneal placement must be minimized to limit risk of bowel obstruction and intestinal fistula. Herein, the utility of surgical grafts derived from urinary bladder matrix (UBM) and small intestine submucosa (SIS) to minimize tissue attachments was investigated in a rabbit model of intraperitoneal tissue attachment.

The rabbit model entailed excision of the peritoneum and abrasion of the cecum to induce the formation of tissue attachment between the bowel and peritoneum (n=6 per treatment and time point). Commercially available UBM and SIS grafts (3 variable thickness UBM grafts and 1 SIS graft) were placed intraperitoneally and sutured to the peritoneum to reinforce the midline repair. Animals with non-reinforced repairs were used as controls. At 14 and 90 days, the number and severity of tissue attachments between the device and the surrounding viscera were assessed and tissues were processed for histology.

At both time points, all three UBM groups had fewer animals with tissue attachments (Fig.1) and lower average severity scores than the SIS group. When compared to controls, the UBM groups had fewer and/or smaller tissue attachments (single vs multifocal) and lower attachment severity scores at both time points. At 14 days, all devices remained largely non-resorbed while at 90 days moderate device degradation was observed across all groups, with the thinnest UBM devices appearing substantially degraded.  Histologic evaluation revealed closure of the midline defect and granulation tissue deposition for all groups, with appreciable differences in semi-quantitative histological assessments for certain cell types. At 14 days, all surgical meshes showed increased numbers of macrophages compared to control animals. Lymphocytes were also more readily apparent in UBM compared to SIS devices. At 90 days there were increased numbers of multinucleated giant cells for SIS compared to UBM. 

This study evaluated the ability of biologically-derived surgical meshes to minimize tissue attachments in a preclinical model in which adhesion formation would normally be expected. UBM devices all showed performance that was similar to or better than SIS devices with respect to limiting tissue attachment formation when the devices are placed intraperitoneally. The results of this study support the use of UBM-based devices for intraperitoneal repair reinforcement as well as laparoscopic deployment of biologically derived surgical meshes.  


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 92693

Program Number: P552

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search