• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Evaluating predictors of patient comfort during colonoscopy

Evaluating predictors of patient comfort during colonoscopy

Curtis Marcoux, BSc, David Pace, MD, Mark Borgaonkar, MD, MSc, Lougheed Muna, BSc, Brad Evans, BSc, Darrell Boone, MD, Jerry McGrath, MD, MSc. Memorial University of Newfoundland

Introduction: The growing importance of colonoscopy for the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer has led to increasing emphasis on the quality of endoscopic procedures. Patient comfort is considered a performance indicator for colonoscopy. Our aim was to assess predictors of patient comfort during colonoscopy.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 3235 patients who underwent colonoscopy in St. John’s, NL in the year 2012. Data from 628 patients were excluded due to the absence of patient comfort score. Data were obtained from endoscopic procedure reports and nursing reports in the electronic medical record (EMR). The relationship between patient comfort and the following variables was evaluated: patient age, patient gender, ASA classification, use of sedation, incomplete endoscopy, endoscopist performing the procedure, specialty of the endoscopist, and annual volume, quality of bowel preparation, and type of bowel preparation. Univariate analysis using ANOVA for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables was performed to identify variables associated with patient comfort (p ≤ 0.1). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify variables independently associated with patient comfort (p ≤ 0.05). Data on patient comfort were obtained by reviewing the endoscopy nursing notes recorded during the procedure and patients were classified as confortable or uncomfortable. For comparisons using colonoscopy volume, endoscopists were divided into two groups based on annual volume: those who performed at least 250 colonoscopies (high volume) and those who performed fewer (low volume).

Results: Mean patient age was 58.4 (±12.4) with 55.8% being female. Data from colonoscopies performed by 8 gastroenterologists and 13 general surgeons were obtained. Gastroenterologists performed 2048 (63.3%) colonoscopies while general surgeons performed 1187 (36.7%). 29% of patients were noted to have discomfort. In univariate analysis, mean age was lower in patients who reported discomfort (56.5 vs. 59.0; p < 0.001). Discomfort was noted more frequently in women compared to men (36.1% vs. 19.9% p < 0.001), in patients with higher mean ASA classification (2.57 vs. 2.44, p = 0.048), and incomplete colonoscopy (66.7% vs. 26.3%; p < 0.001). Moreover, discomfort was associated with the endoscopist performing the procedure (range: 18.2% to 65.6%; p < 0.001), general surgeons compared to gastroenterologists (31.1% vs. 27.3%; p = 0.009), and endoscopists performing fewer than 250 annual colonoscopies (37.2% vs. 27.3%; p ≤ 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that female patients (OR = 2.179, p < 0.001) and younger patients (OR = 1.02, p < 0.001) were more likely to report discomfort during colonoscopy. Furthermore, incomplete endoscopy (OR = 5.387, p < 0.001) and low annual endoscopy volume (OR = 1.610; p < 0.001) were independently associated with patient discomfort. In the multivariate analysis, the endoscopist performing the procedure, specialty of the endoscopist, and ASA classification did not maintain significance.

Conclusion: Female gender, younger age, incomplete colonoscopy and low annual endoscopy volume are associated with higher levels of discomfort.

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals