• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Evaluating abdominal wall function post ventral hernia repair: a comparison of open versus robotic-assisted retromuscular techniques. An Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative study

Evaluating abdominal wall function post ventral hernia repair: a comparison of open versus robotic-assisted retromuscular techniques. An Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative study

Noah Switzer, Savannah Renshaw, Carla Holcomb, Susan Maurer, Courtney Collins, Michael Meara, Vimal Narula, David Renton, Benjamin Poulose. The Ohio State University

INTRODUCTION: To examine abdominal wall function specific quality of life metrics comparing open to robotic-assisted retromuscular hernia repair

Retromuscular ventral hernia repairs are a common surgical technique for the management of incisional hernias. The placement of mesh in a well vascularized plane, free from abdominal viscera, with wide overlap of the hernia defect, have led to lower recurrence rates and durability that make it arguably the gold standard for small to moderate sized hernias.

Robotic–assisted retromuscular repairs have been shown to have similar objective outcomes to the open approach. However, a comparison between the two groups in terms of abdominal wall function.  The Hernia Related Quality of Life Survey (HerQLes) was developed to address this, as a patient-centered method for the evaluation of abdominal wall function.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data using the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative data between 2013 – 2018. Included subjects were >18 years old, had an open or robotic-assisted retromuscular ventral hernia repair performed with HerQLes summary scores available. The HerQLes score is scored out of 100, where a higher number indicates a better quality of life. Wilcoxon rank sum test and Pearson chi-square test were used. A 3:1 propensity-matched analysis was performed with the groups matched on baseline HerQLes scores, age, sex, BMI, smoking status, ASA Class, diabetes and hernia size.

RESULTS: The propensity-matched analysis included 120 patients, stratified 3:1 into open (N= 90) and robotic (N=30) cohorts.  The median age was 61 [52-68] and 58 [51-63] years for open and robotic, respectively. Sixty-nine percent of the open population were female compared to 73% in the robotic arm. The median hernia width was 6cm and 7cm for the open and robotic groups, respectively. Post-operative complications rates were similar in both groups (p=0.29). One-year recurrence rates were not statistically different(19% vs. 23%) in the open and robotic groups, respectively(p=0.6).

The median HerQLes summary scores at 30-days(48 vs 48) and I year(81 vs. 82) were not significantly different between the open and robotic groups, respectively(p=0.54, p=0.86). This resulted in a median change from baseline to 1 year of 21.7 for both(p=0.6).

CONCLUSION: Both open and robotic-assisted retromuscular ventral hernia repairs are associated with improved patient reported quality of life outcomes, with no significant outcome differences between the techniques. Larger study populations are still needed to further evaluate this topic.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95519

Program Number: P563

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search