• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Early experience with endoscopic gastrogastric fistula closure after gastric bypass

Early experience with endoscopic gastrogastric fistula closure after gastric bypass

Matthew Tufts, Thadeus Trus, MD, Stuart R Gordon, MD. Dartmouth-Hitchock Medical Center

Background: Gastrogasrtic fistula (GGF)  is a rare but serious complication of gastric bypass surgery.  Overall incidence has been reported to be from 1.2% to as high as 12 %. Pathogenesis is due to incomplete division of the stomach, staple line breakdown, or a leak/marginal ulcer leading to subsequent fistula formation.  Symptoms included epigastric pain, reflux, lack of early satiety and weight gain  Traditionally, fistula closure is achieved by open or  laparoscopic revisional surgery. Recently, endoscopic closure has been reported with variable levels of success.

Methods: All Apollo Overstitch™ GGF closures at our institution were followed prospectively.  Inclusion criteria were, history of gastric bypass surgery and endoscopic documentation of GGF. All patients underwent mucosal cauterization using argon plasma coagulation of the fistula tract prior to closure. In some cases closure was augmented by large over the scope clip placement. We examined, time from index operation to fistula diagnosis, fistula size, technique of bypass (open versus laparoscopic), symptoms of GGF, mechanism of fistula formation, number of endoscopic interventions, length of follow up and degree of fistula closure.

Results: 6 patients underwent endoscopic GGF closure. 5 patients had open gastric bypass, 1 had laparoscopic bypass.  GGF diagnosis was made 13.3 years after index operation (range 8-20 years).  GGF fistula was secondary to  staple line breakdown in 4 patients, 2 were due to marginal ulceration/perforation.  Average fistula size was 2cm, (range .5-8cm). The most common symptoms of fistula were weight gain and reflux  Average follow up was 20.8 months, (range 1-51 months) An average of 2 endoscopic closure attempts were performed( range 2-5). 2 patients also underwent over the scope clip placement.  2 patients experienced weight loss after endoscopic closure. 4 patients have endoscopic documentation of persistent fistula, one was lost to follow up and 1 has yet to be endoscopically re-evaluated. 1 patient underwent operative revision after closure failure.

Discussion: GGF is a rare complication of gastric bypass. GGF should be suspected in bypass patients that have reflux or weight gain after bypass surgery. . These data suggest GGF fistula endoscopic closure has a high failure rate, particularly after staple line breakdown.   Operative revision remains the optimal treatment. More studies are needed to elucidate which patients may respond to endoscopic fistula closer.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95624

Program Number: P145

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search