• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / CONCURRENT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH BARIATRIC SURGERY: A PROPENSITY-MATCHED ANALYSIS OF THE MBSAQIP DATABASE

CONCURRENT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH BARIATRIC SURGERY: A PROPENSITY-MATCHED ANALYSIS OF THE MBSAQIP DATABASE

Jerry T Dang, MD1, Chantalle Grant, MD1, Noah Switzer, MD, MPH2, Warren Sun, MD1, Daniel W Birch, MD, MSc1, Shahzeer Karmali, MD, MPH1. 1University of Alberta, 2Ohio State University

Introduction: The objective of this study was to examine the safety of bariatric surgery with concurrent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Patients with obesity are at increased risk of gallstone disease and at an even higher risk after bariatric surgery due to sudden weight loss. Although prophylactic cholecystectomy is seldom performed concurrently with bariatric surgery, in patients with gallstone disease, there is debate on the timing of cholecystectomy and whether it should be performed concurrently with bariatric surgery. Previous studies have demonstrated safety with concurrent bariatric surgery and LC.

Methods and Procedures: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) is a clinically-rich database that captures variables specific to bariatric surgery from 791 centres in the United States and Canada. Data was extracted from the 2015 and 2016 participant use files. Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) were included. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes 43281 and 43282.

Propensity scores were calculated for those undergoing concurrent LC as a function of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), procedure, comorbidities, functional status and medical history. One-to-one propensity-matched cohorts were then determined using nearest-neighbor matching within a specified caliper distance set at 0.2 standard deviations. This eliminated approximately 99% of bias due to measured confounders. The primary outcome was 30-day major complications.

Results: A total of 189,560 LSG and 75,492 LRYGB were included. Only 5909 (2.2%) of procedures had concurrent LC. In the unmatched cohort, there were baseline differences in age, sex, and comorbidities. With propensity matching, 5895 pairs were selected with statistically similar preoperative characteristics. The rate of 30-day major complications was significantly higher in the concurrent LC cohort (4.63% vs 3.70%, p = 0.011). In the LC cohort, there were also higher rates of cardiac events (0.12 vs 0.02%, p = 0.034) and acute renal failure (0.22 vs 0.05%, p = 0.012). However, rates of bleed, leak, reoperation, readmission and death were similar. Operative time was longer with concurrent LC (118.4 ± 55.7 vs 90.0 ± 48.8 minutes, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This is the first analysis of a large cohort that has demonstrated increased morbidity with concurrent LC. Although prophylactic cholecystectomy is seldom performed during bariatric surgery, patients with gallstone disease may be better suited to have cholecystectomy performed before or after bariatric surgery due to higher major complication rates.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 94710

Program Number: S062

Presentation Session: Residents and Fellows Session

Presentation Type: ResFel

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search